LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2021-1231: Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches ACI Mode Link Layer Discovery Protocol Port Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) for Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to disable switching on a small form-factor pluggable (SFP) interface. This vulnerability is due to incomplete validation of the source of a received LLDP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted LLDP packet on an SFP interface to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable switching on the SFP interface, which could disrupt network traffic.

MediumCVSS 4.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can let someone with local network adjacency disrupt traffic on an SFP port of affected Cisco Nexus 9000 ACI fabric switches. It is not described as internet-routable, but it can still affect availability for connected workloads or network paths.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate availability risk for Cisco ACI environments. It is most urgent where a disrupted SFP interface could affect production workloads, service paths, or customer-facing connectivity.

Technical view

CVE-2021-1231 is an LLDP validation flaw in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Fabric Switches in ACI mode. Incomplete validation of received LLDP packet sources can allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to disable switching on an SFP interface, causing limited availability impact. The CVE maps to CWE-284.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Cisco Nexus 9000 fabric switches running Cisco NX-OS System Software in ACI mode with reachable SFP interfaces. The attacker must be adjacent to the affected device; the source bundle does not indicate remote internet exposure.

Exploitation context

The public sources describe an unauthenticated adjacent attack path and low attack complexity. CISA KEV status is false in the supplied bundle, and no cited source here confirms active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports adjacency-bound LLDP handling weakness with limited availability impact. The bundle does not provide fixed version details, workaround specifics, proof-of-concept status, or observed exploitation evidence, so validation should be tied directly to Cisco advisory data.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation for ACI fabric switches carrying critical workloads.
  • Reduce untrusted Layer 2 adjacency to fabric switch ports where feasible.
  • Monitor affected SFP interfaces for unexpected link or switching disruption.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Nexus 9000 switches operating in ACI mode.
  • Confirm NX-OS software versions against Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Identify SFP interfaces exposed to adjacent or untrusted network segments.
  • Review operational logs for unexplained SFP interface switching disruption.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2021-1231 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2021-1231Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco NX-OS System Software in ACI Moden/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.