LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-8007: The pwrstudio web application of EV Charger (in the server in Circontrol Raption through 5.6.2) is vulnerab...

The pwrstudio web application of EV Charger (in the server in Circontrol Raption through 5.6.2) is vulnerable to OS command injection via three fields of the configuration menu for ntpserver0, ntpserver1, and pingip.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-8007 is a critical command-injection flaw in the pwrstudio web application used with Circontrol Raption EV charger servers through 5.6.2. If reachable, an unauthenticated network attacker could potentially run operating-system commands, threatening charger availability, data, and system integrity.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any exposed EV charging infrastructure. The issue can affect operational continuity and system control, and the available sources do not provide a confirmed remediation baseline. Prioritize asset discovery, network isolation, and vendor confirmation.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-78 OS command injection through three configuration menu fields: ntpserver0, ntpserver1, and pingip. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 with AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Public sources do not identify CPEs or a confirmed fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant for organizations operating Circontrol Raption EV chargers or associated server components using pwrstudio through 5.6.2. Risk is highest where the web application is reachable from the internet, shared networks, vendor access paths, or site networks. The provided data lacks reliable asset prevalence details.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. A Full Disclosure reference indicates public technical disclosure exists, so defenders should assume capable attackers can understand the issue. No exploit steps are needed to justify urgent exposure reduction.

Researcher notes

The CVE record provides strong severity and vulnerability-class evidence, but affected-product metadata is incomplete. Validate exact product naming, deployment architecture, and fixed-version status with Circontrol before broad conclusions. Avoid assuming exploitation in the wild because KEV is false and no cited source confirms it.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Circontrol guidance for supported fixes or firmware updates.
  • Remove pwrstudio from direct internet exposure.
  • Restrict access to trusted management networks or VPN paths.
  • Limit administrative access to authorized operators only.
  • Monitor for unexpected configuration changes and system behavior.
  • Prioritize isolation if a confirmed patch is unavailable.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Raption chargers and pwrstudio server versions.
  • Identify any systems running through version 5.6.2.
  • Confirm whether pwrstudio is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review logs for suspicious configuration changes or process activity.
  • Document compensating controls and remaining exposed paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-8007 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-8007Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.