Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
McAfee MVISION Endpoint ePO extension before 20.11 has an SSRF flaw. If malicious content is loaded into ePO by an administrator, an attacker could cause ePO to make unintended requests, potentially impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Risk is high, but the bundle indicates high privileges are required.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation where McAfee ePO manages endpoint security at scale, because compromise could affect a central management plane. Treat as high priority for affected versions, but not as an emergency based solely on this bundle because active exploitation is not evidenced.
Technical view
CVE-2020-7328 is CWE-918 SSRF/external entity attack in MVISION Endpoint ePO extension 20.x before 20.11. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.2 with network attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high CIA impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to organizations running McAfee MVISION Endpoint ePO extension 20.x before 20.11. The scenario described requires content for the attack to have been loaded into ePO by an ePO administrator, so ePO admin access and content-management workflows are central to risk.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability is serious because a privileged path may still allow remote control of resources or arbitrary code execution impact once malicious content is present in ePO.
Researcher notes
Evidence is strongest for affected product, vulnerable versions, vulnerability class, and CVSS vector. The bundle does not include exploit indicators, detailed attack preconditions beyond administrator-loaded content, or expanded vendor mitigation text beyond the advisory reference and version boundary.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade MVISION Endpoint ePO extension to 20.11 or later per vendor guidance.
- Review McAfee security bulletin SB10334 for official remediation instructions.
- Restrict ePO administrator access to trusted personnel only.
- Review and remove untrusted content loaded into ePO.
- Monitor vendor guidance for any additional mitigations or detection notes.
Validation and detection
- Inventory ePO extensions and confirm MVISION Endpoint extension version.
- Flag any MVISION Endpoint ePO extension version earlier than 20.11.
- Review recent ePO administrator content-loading activity for anomalies.
- Check ePO logs for unusual outbound requests or extension behavior.
- Confirm remediation status against McAfee bulletin SB10334.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCloud metadata behavior lookup
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2020-7328 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.2 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.25.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.2HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10334CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.