LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-7287: Privilege Escalation vulnerability in EDR for Linux

Privilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Exploit Detection and Response (EDR) for Linux prior to 3.1.0 Hotfix 1 allows a malicious script or program to perform functions that the local executing user has not been granted access to.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets a local malicious script or program gain capabilities beyond the permissions of the user running it on affected McAfee EDR for Linux systems. It is not remotely exploitable by itself, but it can turn a foothold on a Linux endpoint into broader compromise.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority endpoint security maintenance issue, especially where Linux systems hold sensitive data or support critical operations. It requires local access, so it is less urgent than a remote wormable flaw, but it can materially worsen any endpoint compromise.

Technical view

CVE-2020-7287 is a local privilege escalation in McAfee Exploit Detection and Response for Linux before 3.1.0 Hotfix 1. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8, with low privileges required, high attack complexity, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The mapped weakness is CWE-274.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running McAfee EDR for Linux versions prior to 3.1.0 Hotfix 1. The attacker needs local execution with low privileges, so risk is highest on endpoints or servers where untrusted users, scripts, or compromised accounts can run code.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked KEV in the bundle. The vulnerability is still operationally important because local privilege escalation can be paired with phishing, credential theft, or another initial-access path.

Researcher notes

The source evidence identifies privilege escalation and the fixed boundary as prior to 3.1.0 Hotfix 1, but does not provide implementation details, affected build granularity, or exploit telemetry. Avoid assuming broader McAfee product exposure without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected McAfee EDR for Linux deployments to 3.1.0 Hotfix 1 or later.
  • Review the McAfee advisory for vendor-specific remediation and deployment notes.
  • Limit local script and program execution on systems running affected EDR versions.
  • Prioritize systems with shared users, developer access, or elevated operational value.
  • Monitor affected hosts for unusual privileged actions from low-privileged accounts.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux hosts running McAfee EDR and record installed versions and hotfix levels.
  • Confirm no deployment remains below 3.1.0 Hotfix 1.
  • Validate endpoint management records against package data on representative Linux hosts.
  • Review logs for unexpected privilege-boundary events involving local users or scripts.
  • Track exceptions with compensating controls and an owner until patched.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-274: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-7287 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.16Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-7287Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
McAfee,LLCMcAfee Exploit Detection and Response (EDR) for Linux3.1.xListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-274 · source CWE mapping

Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges

Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.