LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-37235: WordPress Theme Wibar 1.1.8 Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Brand Component

WordPress Theme Wibar 1.1.8 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Brand component that allows authenticated users to inject malicious scripts by manipulating the Logo URL parameter. Attackers with editor, administrator, contributor, or author privileges can inject base64-encoded script payloads through the ftc_brand_url input field to execute arbitrary JavaScript when users visit the brand page.

MediumCVSS 6.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-37235 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Wibar theme 1.1.8. A logged-in content user could save script content in a Brand logo URL field, causing JavaScript to run when the brand page is viewed. This is mainly a website integrity and user trust risk.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted web integrity issue, not a critical infrastructure emergency. Prioritize remediation for public sites with many content users or sensitive customer traffic. If the theme is not present, no action is indicated from these sources.

Technical view

The issue affects ThemeFTC Theme Wibar 1.1.8. Sources describe CWE-79 stored XSS in the Brand component via the Logo URL parameter, specifically ftc_brand_url, requiring authenticated privileges such as contributor, author, editor, or administrator. CVSS 3.1 is 6.4 with low privileges and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running Theme Wibar 1.1.8, especially sites with multiple content contributors or delegated admin access. Sites not using this theme or version are not shown affected by the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the supplied sources do not show active exploitation. An ExploitDB reference exists, so public exploit information is available, but that alone does not prove attacks in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports authenticated stored XSS in a specific theme component and version. The source bundle does not name a fixed version, patch, or vendor workaround. Avoid assuming broader Wibar versions or unrelated ThemeFTC products are affected without additional vendor evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Theme Wibar version 1.1.8.
  • Check ThemeFTC or marketplace guidance for an update or vendor remediation.
  • Restrict contributor, author, editor, and administrator access to trusted users only.
  • Review Brand logo URL entries for unexpected encoded or script-like content.
  • Remove or disable Wibar where business use is no longer required.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Theme Wibar 1.1.8 is installed on production WordPress sites.
  • Identify users with contributor, author, editor, or administrator roles.
  • Review Brand component Logo URL values for suspicious stored content.
  • Verify any vendor update sanitizes or escapes the Logo URL field.
  • Check web and admin logs for unusual Brand component modifications.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-37235 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N3.12.7VulnCheck
5.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-37235Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
themeftcTheme Wibar1.1.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.