LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36886: SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 Cross-Site Request Forgery via User Creation

SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that automatically submits a form to create a new admin user with full system privileges when a logged-in user visits the page.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-36886 affects SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8. A logged-in administrator who visits a malicious webpage could unknowingly trigger creation of a new administrative account. This could give an attacker full control of the signage management system. The issue requires user interaction and is not listed in CISA KEV.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority exposure review. The business risk is unauthorized control of digital signage administration, especially if management portals are broadly reachable. Prioritize confirmation of version, access restrictions, and account review before broader remediation planning.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-352 cross-site request forgery in Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 user creation. The CVSS v4.0 score is 6.9. Sources describe missing request validation that allows a crafted webpage to submit an administrative user-creation request through an authenticated victim’s browser.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8 administration is reachable from user workstations or the internet and administrators browse the web while authenticated. The CVE metadata has inconsistent affected-version data, so confirm product and version directly in your environment.

Exploitation context

A public Exploit-DB reference exists, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation. Exploitation depends on social engineering or browser interaction by a logged-in privileged user and access to the vulnerable management interface from that user’s browser.

Researcher notes

The source bundle names SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage 3.4.8, but the affected CPE/version metadata appears incomplete or inconsistent. Exploit-DB and Zero Science Lab are referenced, but no KEV listing or source-proven active exploitation is provided. Avoid assuming patch availability without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check SpinetiX guidance for fixed versions or vendor-recommended mitigations.
  • Restrict administrative interface access to trusted networks or VPN users.
  • Require administrators to log out when not actively managing signage.
  • Review and remove unexpected administrative accounts.
  • Use separate browsers or profiles for administrative sessions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory SpinetiX Fusion Digital Signage deployments and versions.
  • Confirm whether any instance is running version 3.4.8.
  • Review admin account lists for unauthorized or recent additions.
  • Check web access controls around the management interface.
  • Monitor logs for administrative user-creation events.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36886 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-36886Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SpenetiX AGFusion Digital Signage0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.