LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36865: Nagios XI < 5.7.2 XSS via BPI Config Management

Nagios XI versions prior to 5.7.2 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via the BPI (Business Process Intelligence) component’s Config Management and Edit Config page. Insufficient validation or escaping of user-supplied input may allow an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary script in the context of a victim's browser.

MediumCVSS 5.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Older versions of Nagios XI, a popular IT monitoring tool, contain a flaw in the Business Process Intelligence (BPI) configuration pages that lets an attacker plant malicious code in the browser of an authenticated user who views a tampered page. The risk is limited because exploitation requires both an authenticated account and a victim clicking through, but it can lead to session abuse inside the monitoring console.

Executive priority

Schedule a routine patch cycle to upgrade Nagios XI to 5.7.2 or later. Not an emergency given moderate severity and no known active exploitation, but should not linger because monitoring tools often hold privileged credentials and broad network visibility.

Technical view

CVE-2020-36865 is a stored/reflected cross-site scripting (CWE-79) issue in Nagios XI versions prior to 5.7.2, located in the BPI component's Config Management and Edit Config pages. User-supplied input is insufficiently validated or escaped, allowing script execution in the victim's browser context. CVSS 4.0 base 5.1 reflects network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, and limited confidentiality/integrity impact on a subsequent component.

Likely exposure

Organizations running Nagios XI installations earlier than 5.7.2 with the BPI module enabled and accessible to authenticated users. Internet-exposed Nagios XI portals or shared multi-tenant monitoring deployments raise the exposure profile. Single-administrator, internal-only instances on patched releases are not exposed.

Exploitation context

Not listed in CISA KEV and no public reports of active exploitation cited in the source bundle. Exploitation requires an authenticated attacker with access to BPI configuration and a victim user interacting with the crafted content, which limits opportunistic abuse but is realistic in shared admin environments.

Researcher notes

Authenticated XSS in the BPI Config Management and Edit Config pages of Nagios XI < 5.7.2; CWE-79; CVSS 4.0 vector indicates PR:L and UI:P with limited subsequent-component impact (SC:L/SI:L). Affected version data in the bundle is sparse (defaultStatus unaffected, version "0"), so confirm exact fixed build via the Nagios changelog and the VulnCheck advisory before scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Nagios XI to version 5.7.2 or later per vendor changelog.
  • Restrict BPI configuration access to a minimal set of trusted administrators.
  • Place Nagios XI behind authenticated VPN or SSO; avoid public internet exposure.
  • Review session and CSRF protections; enforce short session lifetimes for admins.
  • Monitor BPI config changes and admin activity for unexpected script-like inputs.

Validation and detection

  • Identify Nagios XI version via the admin console or version file and compare to 5.7.2.
  • Inventory which users hold BPI configuration privileges and whether BPI is enabled.
  • Confirm patch level after upgrade by re-checking the version string.
  • Review proxy or WAF logs for unusual BPI Config Management requests.
  • Audit admin browser sessions and recent BPI config edits for anomalies.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36865 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:NPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.1Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-36865Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NagiosXI0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.