LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36747: Lightweight Sidebar Manager <= 1.1.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Lightweight Sidebar Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metabox_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save metbox data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-36747 affects the Lightweight Sidebar Manager WordPress plugin up to version 1.1.4. A malicious site or link could trick a logged-in administrator into unintentionally changing sidebar metabox data. Business impact is limited integrity risk, but exposed WordPress admin workflows should still be cleaned up quickly.

Executive priority

Treat this as a medium-priority WordPress hygiene issue. It is not documented as actively exploited, but it can change site configuration if an administrator is tricked. Prioritize internet-facing WordPress sites and environments with many administrators.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-352 cross-site request forgery caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation in metabox_save(). The CVSS v3.1 score is 4.3. Exploitation requires administrator interaction and can allow unauthorized saving of metabox data, with no confidentiality or availability impact stated in the sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with Lightweight Sidebar Manager installed at version 1.1.4 or earlier. Sites without the plugin, inactive installations, or later confirmed-fixed versions are not shown as affected by the provided evidence.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The attack requires tricking a site administrator into an action such as clicking a link, so risk depends heavily on administrator browsing exposure and plugin deployment.

Researcher notes

Evidence names the affected function and CSRF root cause, but the bundle does not clearly state a fixed version. The WordPress Trac changeset and Wordfence entry should be used to confirm remediation details before declaring systems fixed.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Lightweight Sidebar Manager and record installed versions.
  • Update the plugin to a vendor-confirmed fixed release if available.
  • Remove or disable the plugin where it is unnecessary.
  • Check Wordfence, WordPress.org, and vendor guidance for fixed-version confirmation.
  • Remind administrators to avoid untrusted links while authenticated to WordPress.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any WordPress site runs Lightweight Sidebar Manager version 1.1.4 or earlier.
  • Review sidebar and metabox configuration for unauthorized or unexpected changes.
  • Verify the installed plugin package includes corrected nonce validation for metabox saves.
  • Check security telemetry for administrator sessions followed by unusual configuration changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36747 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-36747Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
brainstormforceLightweight Sidebar Manager0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.