LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36738: Cool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline) <= 2.0.2 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass

The Cool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ctl_save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save field icons via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-36738 affects the Cool Timeline WordPress plugin through version 2.0.2. A malicious site could trick a logged-in administrator into sending an unintended request that changes saved field-icon settings. Business impact is limited integrity risk, but exposed WordPress sites should still update because admin-driven changes can affect site content or presentation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a routine but real WordPress maintenance item. It is not currently evidenced as exploited in the bundle, but vulnerable plugins on public sites remain operational risk. Patch or disable during the next maintenance window, faster for high-value or heavily administered sites.

Technical view

This is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in the plugin's ctl_save() function caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation. The reported attack requires administrator interaction and can let an unauthenticated attacker save field icons through a forged request. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with low integrity impact and no confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites using Cool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline) at version 2.0.2 or earlier. The bundle does not identify affected hosting platforms beyond WordPress, and the affected metadata is partly inconsistent with the narrative description.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The attack requires tricking a site administrator into performing an action, such as following a link, while authenticated to WordPress.

Researcher notes

The main evidence points to CSRF in ctl_save() and a WordPress Trac changeset for fa-icons-class.php. Affected metadata is inconsistent: the narrative says versions up to 2.0.2, while the affected entry lists version 0/default unaffected. No exploit status or exact fixed release is provided here.

Mitigation direction

  • Update Cool Timeline to a current vendor-supported release containing the CSRF fix.
  • If updating is not possible, disable or remove the plugin until vendor guidance is confirmed.
  • Review WordPress administrator accounts for unnecessary privileges and stale sessions.
  • Remind administrators not to follow untrusted links while authenticated to WordPress.
  • Monitor vendor, WordPress plugin, Wordfence, and Nintechnet advisories for specific fixed-version guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Cool Timeline plugin and record installed versions.
  • Prioritize any instance running version 2.0.2 or earlier for remediation.
  • Confirm the plugin code includes nonce validation around ctl_save() or the referenced patched file.
  • Review recent administrative changes to timeline icon settings for unexpected modifications.
  • Check whether compensating controls limit administrator exposure to untrusted web content.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36738 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
10Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-36738Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
narinder-singhCool Timeline (Horizontal & Vertical Timeline)0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.