LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36708: Epsilon Framework Themes (Various Versions) - Function Injection

The following themes for WordPress are vulnerable to Function Injections in versions up to and including Shapely <= 1.2.7, NewsMag <= 2.4.1, Activello <= 1.4.0, Illdy <= 2.1.4, Allegiant <= 1.2.2, Newspaper X <= 1.3.1, Pixova Lite <= 2.0.5, Brilliance <= 1.2.7, MedZone Lite <= 1.2.4, Regina Lite <= 2.0.4, Transcend <= 1.1.8, Affluent <= 1.1.0, Bonkers <= 1.0.4, Antreas <= 1.0.2, Sparkling <= 2.4.8, and NatureMag Lite <= 1.0.4. This is due to epsilon_framework_ajax_action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call functions and achieve remote code execution.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a critical WordPress theme vulnerability. Older Epsilon Framework-based themes could let an unauthenticated internet user trigger unsafe server-side functions, with potential remote code execution. For an affected public website, the business risk is full site compromise, data exposure, defacement, or malware placement.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation urgently for any internet-facing WordPress site using these themes. The vulnerability has critical impact, requires no authentication, and has historical public reporting of large-scale targeting against the theme family.

Technical view

The flaw is a function injection issue in epsilon_framework_ajax_action across multiple WordPress themes and versions. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8 because attack requires network access, no login, no user interaction, and can impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on public WordPress sites running vulnerable versions of the named Epsilon Framework themes, including Shapely, NewsMag, Activello, Illdy, Sparkling, and related themes listed in the CVE description.

Exploitation context

The bundle says this CVE is not CISA KEV-listed. However, a cited Wordfence source reports large-scale attacks targeting Epsilon Framework themes in November 2020. Treat internet-facing vulnerable sites as high-risk even if current exploitation evidence is not provided here.

Researcher notes

The CVE bundle’s structured affected entries appear inconsistent with the descriptive affected-version ranges. Use the narrative version thresholds and cited advisories for triage, then confirm exact installed theme versions locally. Do not infer current exploitation beyond the cited 2020 reporting.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the named Epsilon Framework themes and vulnerable versions.
  • Update affected themes using vendor or WordPress.org guidance where available.
  • Remove or replace unsupported themes if no safe update is available.
  • Review vendor advisories before assuming a specific fixed version.
  • Prioritize internet-facing and business-critical WordPress sites first.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each WordPress theme name and version against the CVE affected-version list.
  • Check whether epsilon_framework_ajax_action exists in deployed theme code.
  • Review web logs for suspicious unauthenticated requests to WordPress AJAX endpoints.
  • Verify patched or replacement themes are installed in production.
  • Run authenticated WordPress vulnerability scanning with current signatures.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36708 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-36708Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
machothemesAntreas0unaffected
machothemesNatureMag Lite0unaffected
silkalnsBonkers0unaffected
wpchillAffluent0unaffected
wpchillTranscend0unaffected
wpchillAllegiant0unaffected
machothemesMedZone Lite0unaffected
silkalnsShapely0unaffected
wpchillBrilliance0unaffected
silkalnsNewspaper X0unaffected
silkalnsActivello0unaffected
machothemesRegina Lite0unaffected
silkalnsPixova Lite0unaffected
silkalnsIlldy0unaffected
machothemesNewsMag0unaffected
silkalnsSparkling0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.