LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-36065: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FlyCms 1.0 allows attackers to add arbitrary administrat...

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FlyCms 1.0 allows attackers to add arbitrary administrator accounts via system/admin/admin_save.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-36065 is a CSRF flaw reported in FlyCms 1.0. If an administrator is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content while logged in, an attacker could cause an unwanted administrative action, including creation of an administrator account.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for any FlyCms 1.0 deployment with active administration. The business risk is unauthorized administrative access, but urgency depends on whether the product is deployed and whether admins can be targeted while logged in.

Technical view

The CVE describes missing or insufficient CSRF protection on FlyCms 1.0 administrative account creation through system/admin/admin_save. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8 high, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running FlyCms 1.0, especially where the administrative interface is reachable by administrators using normal browsers. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, deployment prevalence, or confirmed affected versions beyond FlyCms 1.0.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The attack depends on user interaction by an authenticated administrator, consistent with CSRF impact rather than direct unauthenticated account creation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the CVE description and references identify FlyCms 1.0 and the administrative save path, but affected CPE data is listed as unavailable. Avoid assuming broader version impact or public exploitation without additional source evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the upstream repository and issue for official remediation guidance or patched releases.
  • Restrict FlyCms administrative access to trusted networks or VPN users where feasible.
  • Review administrator accounts for unexpected additions or privilege changes.
  • Disable or retire unsupported FlyCms deployments if no maintained fix is available.
  • Apply standard CSRF protections to state-changing admin actions if maintaining a fork.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory environments for FlyCms and confirm any FlyCms 1.0 deployments.
  • Identify whether administrative routes are internet-accessible or broadly reachable internally.
  • Review access logs and admin user records for unexpected account creation events.
  • Confirm whether upstream guidance or local patches address CSRF on admin account changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-36065 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-36065Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.