LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3577: Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software Inline Pair/Passive Mode Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the ingress packet processing path of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software for interfaces that are configured either as Inline Pair or in Passive mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation when Ethernet frames are processed. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious Ethernet frames through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker do either of the following: Fill the /ngfw partition on the device: A full /ngfw partition could result in administrators being unable to log in to the device (including logging in through the console port) or the device being unable to boot up correctly. Note: Manual intervention is required to recover from this situation. Customers are advised to contact the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC) to help recover a device in this condition. Cause a process crash: The process crash would cause the device to reload. No manual intervention is necessary to recover the device after the reload.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco Firepower Threat Defense devices using Inline Pair or Passive mode can be forced into a denial-of-service condition by a nearby unauthenticated attacker. The impact is availability: the device may reload, fail to boot correctly, or become inaccessible to administrators if the /ngfw partition fills.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for perimeter or segmentation firewalls in inline paths. The main business risk is loss of inspection or enforcement during a DoS, with possible manual recovery if storage fills. Urgency depends on whether affected interface modes are deployed.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3577 is an ingress packet-processing validation flaw in Cisco FTD Software for Inline Pair or Passive mode interfaces. Malformed Ethernet frame handling can trigger either /ngfw partition exhaustion requiring manual recovery, or a process crash that reloads the device. CVSS v3.0 is 7.4, with adjacent-network attack vector and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Cisco Firepower Threat Defense deployments with interfaces configured as Inline Pair or Passive mode. The attacker must be adjacent, not necessarily internet-routed. The source bundle does not provide affected version ranges, so teams need vendor guidance and asset configuration review.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The vulnerability is unauthenticated and low complexity, but requires adjacent network position and traffic through the affected device. No public exploit status is established in the supplied bundle.

Researcher notes

The bundle establishes vulnerability class, attack vector, mode-specific exposure, and impact, but does not include fixed version data. Avoid assuming broader Cisco product exposure. Validation should focus on FTD interface mode, release mapping from Cisco, and operational symptoms of reload or /ngfw exhaustion.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Prioritize FTD devices with Inline Pair or Passive mode interfaces.
  • Plan remediation during a maintenance window because security devices may reload.
  • Contact Cisco TAC if /ngfw fills or the device cannot boot.
  • Monitor affected devices for unexpected reloads and partition exhaustion.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco FTD appliances and virtual deployments.
  • Identify interfaces configured as Inline Pair or Passive mode.
  • Compare installed FTD versions with Cisco’s advisory guidance.
  • Check device health for /ngfw partition usage anomalies.
  • Review operational history for unexplained reloads or process crashes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3577 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H2.84Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

7.4High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3577Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Firepower Threat Defense Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.