LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3483: Duo Network Gateway (DNG) Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Duo has identified and fixed an issue with the Duo Network Gateway (DNG) product in which some customer-provided SSL certificates and private keys were not excluded from logging. This issue resulted in certificate and private key information being written out in plain-text to local files on the DNG host. Any private keys logged in this way could be viewed by those with access to the DNG host operating system without any need for reversing encrypted values or similar techniques. An attacker that gained access to the DNG logs and with the ability to intercept and manipulate network traffic between a user and the DNG, could decrypt and manipulate SSL/TLS connections to the DNG and to the protected applications behind it. Duo Network Gateway (DNG) versions 1.3.3 through 1.5.7 are affected.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Duo Network Gateway could write customer SSL certificates and private keys into local plaintext logs. Anyone with access to those logs could obtain key material that protects connections to the gateway and applications behind it.

Executive priority

Prioritize validation and key rotation for any affected DNG instance. This is not described as broad remote exploitation, but exposed private keys can undermine TLS trust for protected applications.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3483 affects Duo Network Gateway versions 1.3.3 through 1.5.7. The issue is improper exclusion of SSL certificate and private key data from logging, classified as CWE-256, with CVSS 3.1 score 7.1 and high confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations that ran affected Duo Network Gateway versions, especially where local host or log access was available to administrators, support users, or compromised low-privilege accounts.

Exploitation context

The sources do not show known active exploitation or KEV listing. Abuse requires access to DNG logs, plus the ability to intercept and manipulate network traffic involving the gateway.

Researcher notes

Evidence is based on the CVE record and Duo advisory. Sources do not provide exploit code, observed exploitation, or detailed fixed-version guidance beyond stating Duo identified and fixed the issue.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Duo Network Gateway deployments according to Duo vendor guidance.
  • Treat any logged private keys as exposed and rotate affected certificates.
  • Restrict access to DNG host operating systems and local logs.
  • Review log retention and remove exposed key material per policy.
  • Check vendor advisory for any product-specific cleanup instructions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Duo Network Gateway deployments and identify versions 1.3.3 through 1.5.7.
  • Review local DNG logs for certificate or private key material.
  • Confirm exposed certificates and keys have been replaced.
  • Verify log access is limited to authorized administrative users.
  • Confirm no protected application still trusts an exposed certificate key pair.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-256: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3483 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.85.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-3483Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoDuo Network Gateway (DNG)unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-256 · source CWE mapping

Plaintext Storage of a Password

Plaintext Storage of a Password represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.