LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3444: Cisco SD-WAN Software Packet Filtering Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the packet filtering features of Cisco SD-WAN Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass L3 and L4 traffic filters. The vulnerability is due to improper traffic filtering conditions on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious TCP packet with specific characteristics and sending it to a targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the L3 and L4 traffic filters and inject an arbitrary packet into the network.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-3444 is a Cisco SD-WAN Software flaw where traffic filters may not enforce rules correctly. A remote unauthenticated attacker could bypass L3/L4 filters and inject a packet into the network. The business risk is weakened segmentation, not direct system takeover based on the supplied evidence.

Executive priority

Prioritize review where Cisco SD-WAN filters separate sensitive networks or enforce partner, branch, or production boundaries. The severity is moderate, but business impact can rise if those filters are a primary segmentation control.

Technical view

The issue is improper traffic filtering conditions in Cisco SD-WAN Software packet filtering features. The CVSS 3.0 score is 5.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, changed scope, and low integrity impact. Affected version detail is not provided in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Cisco SD-WAN Solution deployments using the affected packet filtering features. The source bundle does not identify specific vulnerable versions, device models, or deployment modes, so asset validation must start with Cisco advisory mapping.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploitation is remote and unauthenticated, but KEV is false and no cited source states active exploitation. Treat this as a control-bypass risk that could matter most where SD-WAN filters enforce segmentation or trust boundaries.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Cisco advisory reference. The weakness is categorized as CWE-20. The record supports a packet-filter bypass with integrity impact only; it does not support claims of confidentiality loss, availability impact, public exploit code, or active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected releases, fixed versions, and vendor guidance.
  • Identify Cisco SD-WAN devices enforcing L3/L4 traffic filters.
  • Apply vendor-recommended remediation once affected releases are confirmed.
  • Use compensating upstream or downstream controls for critical segmentation.
  • Avoid relying on the affected filters as the only boundary control.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco SD-WAN Solution deployments and software releases.
  • Confirm whether L3/L4 packet filtering features are enabled.
  • Map deployed releases against Cisco's advisory guidance.
  • Review segmentation assumptions that depend on SD-WAN packet filters.
  • Check security monitoring for unexpected traffic crossing filtered boundaries.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3444 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3444Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco SD-WAN Solutionn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.