LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3434: Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the interprocess communication (IPC) channel of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IPC message to the AnyConnect process on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to stop the AnyConnect process, causing a DoS condition on the device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-3434 can let a logged-in Windows user crash Cisco AnyConnect on the affected device. The business impact is loss of VPN client availability on that endpoint, not data theft or remote compromise based on the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority endpoint availability issue. It is not described as remote code execution or data exposure, but VPN disruption can affect workforce access and incident response readiness.

Technical view

The flaw is insufficient input validation in the Windows AnyConnect IPC channel. An authenticated local attacker with valid Windows credentials could send a crafted IPC message that stops the AnyConnect process, causing denial of service. CVSS 3.1 is 5.5 with local attack vector and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Windows systems running Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client versions identified as affected by Cisco. The provided bundle does not include exact affected or fixed version ranges.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires valid local Windows credentials, so this is mainly an endpoint hardening and availability risk.

Researcher notes

Classified as CWE-20 with CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. The bundle lacks detailed version and fix data, so validation should anchor on Cisco’s advisory rather than assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco’s advisory for affected and fixed AnyConnect Windows releases.
  • Apply Cisco-recommended updates or remediation once confirmed for your deployed version.
  • Restrict local Windows access to authorized users only.
  • Monitor for repeated AnyConnect crashes or unexpected process termination.
  • Include VPN client resilience in endpoint incident triage.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows endpoints running Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client.
  • Compare installed versions with Cisco’s advisory and asset records.
  • Review endpoint telemetry for AnyConnect process stops or crash events.
  • Confirm users do not have unnecessary local access on VPN endpoints.
  • Track remediation status for affected Windows AnyConnect installations.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3434 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-3434Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Clientn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.