LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3430: Cisco Jabber for Windows Protocol Handler Command Injection Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the application protocol handling features of Cisco Jabber for Windows could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of input to the application protocol handlers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing a user to click a link within a message sent by email or other messaging platform. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on a targeted system with the privileges of the user account that is running the Cisco Jabber client software.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco Jabber for Windows could let an attacker run commands on an employee’s computer if the employee clicks a crafted link sent through email or another messaging platform. The impact is serious because commands run with that user’s privileges and can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for environments using Cisco Jabber for Windows. It is user-click dependent, but the potential result is arbitrary command execution on employee workstations with high business impact.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3430 is a command injection flaw in Cisco Jabber for Windows application protocol handlers. Improper input handling allows unauthenticated remote command execution after user interaction. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations are likely exposed where Cisco Jabber for Windows is installed on user endpoints, especially on systems where users can receive and click links from email or messaging platforms. The bundle does not identify exact affected versions.

Exploitation context

The source states exploitation requires convincing a user to click a link. The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or provide evidence of active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed from these sources.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports CWE-78 command injection through protocol handler input handling. Affected version detail is incomplete in the provided bundle, so validation should anchor on Cisco’s advisory and local endpoint inventory rather than assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Cisco Jabber for Windows installations across managed endpoints.
  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected and fixed release guidance.
  • Prioritize upgrade or removal decisions based on Cisco’s guidance.
  • Warn users not to open unexpected Jabber-related links from messages.
  • Monitor vendor guidance for any updated mitigation information.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Cisco Jabber for Windows is installed on endpoints.
  • Compare installed versions against Cisco’s advisory guidance.
  • Check vulnerability scanner findings for CVE-2020-3430.
  • Review email and messaging telemetry for suspicious link delivery to Jabber users.
  • Confirm remediation through endpoint inventory after changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3430 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-3430Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Jabbern/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.