LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3368: Cisco Email Security Appliance URL Filtering Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the antispam protection mechanisms of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the URL reputation filters on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of URLs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting the URL in a particular way. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the URL reputation filters that are configured for the affected device, which could allow malicious URLs to pass through the device.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco ESA could fail to catch some malicious links because URL filtering did not validate certain URLs correctly. An attacker could send specially formed links that bypass URL reputation checks, increasing phishing and malware-delivery risk. The issue is medium severity, not a direct appliance takeover.

Executive priority

Treat as a medium-priority email security control weakness. It does not indicate appliance compromise, but it can reduce protection against malicious links and phishing. Prioritize verification and vendor-guided remediation for internet-facing mail security infrastructure.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3368 is a CWE-20 input validation flaw in Cisco AsyncOS antispam protections for Cisco Email Security Appliance. Remote unauthenticated attackers can cause URL reputation filters to be bypassed, allowing malicious URLs through configured filtering. CVSS is 5.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Organizations using Cisco Email Security Appliance with affected AsyncOS software and URL reputation filtering enabled. The provided sources do not identify specific vulnerable or fixed versions, so exposure must be verified against Cisco's advisory and appliance inventory.

Exploitation context

The sources describe remote unauthenticated exploitation with low complexity, but do not cite active exploitation. The CVE is not marked as CISA KEV in the provided bundle. Practical risk is higher where ESA is a primary phishing-link control.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports URL filtering bypass only. Do not infer broader ESA compromise, data exposure, or service disruption from the provided sources. Version and fix details are incomplete in the bundle; use Cisco's advisory as the authoritative source for release-specific validation.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco's advisory for affected AsyncOS releases and official fixed software guidance.
  • Inventory Cisco ESA deployments and map them to Cisco's affected-release information.
  • Confirm URL reputation filtering remains enabled while remediation is planned.
  • Add compensating downstream controls for phishing-link detection and user reporting.
  • Monitor mail security logs for suspicious links that passed ESA filtering.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all Cisco ESA appliances and their AsyncOS versions.
  • Compare deployed versions with the Cisco advisory's affected and fixed release data.
  • Verify URL reputation filtering policies are configured on each ESA.
  • Review recent email telemetry for malicious URLs delivered through ESA.
  • Confirm remediation status after vendor-guided update or mitigation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3368 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3368Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Email Security Appliance (ESA)n/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.