LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3329: Cisco IMC Supervisor, Cisco UCS Director, and Cisco UCS Director Express for Big Data Role-Based Access Control Vulnerability

A vulnerability in role-based access control of Cisco Integrated Management Controller (IMC) Supervisor, Cisco UCS Director, and Cisco UCS Director Express for Big Data could allow a read-only authenticated, remote attacker to disable user accounts on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to incorrect allocation of the enable/disable action button under the role-based access control code on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating as a read-only user and then updating the roles of other users to disable them. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to disable users, including administrative users.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability lets a low-privileged, read-only account disable other users, including administrators, in affected Cisco management products. It does not expose data or grant full control by itself, but it can disrupt administration and recovery if an attacker already has a valid account.

Executive priority

Prioritize based on whether these Cisco management consoles are internet-exposed, broadly reachable internally, or used for critical infrastructure operations. The business risk is administrative disruption, especially if a compromised low-privilege account can disable administrators during an incident.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3329 is an RBAC flaw in Cisco IMC Supervisor, Cisco UCS Director, and Cisco UCS Director Express for Big Data. The enable/disable action was incorrectly available to read-only users, allowing authenticated remote role updates that disable accounts. CVSS v3.0 is 4.3, with low attack complexity and required privileges.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running the named Cisco management platforms with reachable authenticated access paths. The source bundle does not provide affected version ranges, so teams must confirm product versions against Cisco’s advisory and internal asset inventory.

Exploitation context

Sources describe exploitation by an authenticated read-only remote user abusing incorrect RBAC behavior. There is no KEV listing in the bundle and no cited evidence of active exploitation. Treat this as an insider, stolen-credential, or weak-account-control risk rather than unauthenticated compromise.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for the vulnerability behavior and severity, but incomplete for affected version ranges and fixed releases in the supplied bundle. Do not assume exploit activity. Focus validation on RBAC enforcement, account-change auditing, and vendor-confirmed remediation status.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Cisco IMC Supervisor, UCS Director, and UCS Director Express for Big Data deployments.
  • Review the Cisco advisory for affected and fixed release guidance.
  • Restrict management access to trusted networks and approved administrators.
  • Remove unnecessary read-only accounts and stale user access.
  • Monitor for unexpected account disablement or role changes.

Validation and detection

  • Compare installed product versions with Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Confirm read-only roles cannot disable users after remediation.
  • Review audit logs for read-only users changing roles or disabling accounts.
  • Verify administrator accounts remain accessible and recovery accounts are protected.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3329 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3329Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco UCS Directorn/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.