LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3308: Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software Signature Verification Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Image Signature Verification feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator-level credentials to install a malicious software patch on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper verification of digital signatures for patch images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an unsigned software patch to bypass signature checks and loading it on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software patch image.

MediumCVSS 4.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets someone who already has administrator access to a Cisco Firepower Threat Defense device bypass patch signature checks and install a malicious software patch. It is not a remote takeover without credentials, but it can undermine trust in a security appliance and should be treated as important where FTD admin access is weakly controlled.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation during the next network security maintenance cycle, faster if FTD administrator access is broadly shared or externally reachable. The vulnerability has moderate severity because it requires admin credentials, but compromise could damage trust in a security control protecting the business.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3308 is a CWE-347 signature-verification bypass in Cisco FTD Software patch image handling. An authenticated remote attacker with administrator-level credentials could load an unsigned crafted patch that bypasses digital signature checks, allowing the device to boot a malicious patch image. CVSS is 4.9 with high privileges required and high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Cisco Firepower Threat Defense Software deployments. The source bundle does not provide affected version ranges, so teams must compare deployed FTD versions with Cisco’s advisory and inventory all managed and standalone FTD devices.

Exploitation context

The sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Practical abuse requires administrator-level credentials, so the main concern is compromised admin accounts, insider misuse, or weaknesses in patch governance rather than unauthenticated internet-scale exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for the vulnerability mechanics, privileges required, CVSS vector, and affected product family. The provided bundle does not include exact affected versions, fixed releases, workarounds, or exploitation-in-the-wild evidence, so validation should be anchored to Cisco’s advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco’s advisory for affected releases and vendor-recommended updates.
  • Apply Cisco-provided fixed software or patch guidance where applicable.
  • Restrict FTD administrative access to trusted management networks and named administrators.
  • Enforce strong authentication and least privilege for FTD management accounts.
  • Use only Cisco-sourced update images through approved change-control workflows.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Cisco FTD Software deployments and record exact versions.
  • Compare deployed versions against Cisco’s advisory for CVE-2020-3308.
  • Review FTD administrative accounts for unnecessary or shared administrator privileges.
  • Check change records for unexpected FTD patch or image installation events.
  • Confirm update images came from approved Cisco distribution channels.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-347: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3308 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.9 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.9CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N1.23.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

4.9Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3308Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Firepower Threat Defense Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-347 · source CWE mapping

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.