LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3244: Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers Enhanced Charging Service Rule Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the Enhanced Charging Service (ECS) functionality of Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user traffic going through an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malformed HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules and potentially avoid being charged for traffic consumption.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets remote unauthenticated users bypass traffic charging or classification rules on affected Cisco ASR 5000 ECS deployments. It is not described as data theft or outage, but it can undermine billing, traffic policy enforcement, and revenue controls.

Executive priority

Prioritize as moderate where ASR 5000 ECS supports billing or policy enforcement. The main risk is revenue leakage or policy bypass, not system takeover. Confirm exposure before emergency action.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3244 is an insufficient input validation issue in Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software Enhanced Charging Service. Malformed HTTP traffic passing through an affected device can bypass ECS traffic classification rules, causing low integrity impact under CVSS 3.0 score 5.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software deployments using Enhanced Charging Service for traffic classification or charging. Organizations without ASR 5000 ECS in the traffic path are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploitation is remote and unauthenticated with low attack complexity. It does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation. Treat exploit activity as unconfirmed from the available evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow: affected product, impact, CVSS, CWE-20, and Cisco advisory reference are provided. No patch details, exploit telemetry, or version list are included in the bundle, so validation should depend on Cisco advisory data and local configuration.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Cisco ASR 5000 systems running Enhanced Charging Service.
  • Review the Cisco advisory for affected releases and vendor remediation guidance.
  • Prioritize remediation where ECS drives billing or subscriber traffic policy enforcement.
  • Monitor charging, classification, and policy logs for unexpected HTTP rule bypass patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory ASR 5000 software versions and ECS configuration status.
  • Confirm whether ECS classifies HTTP subscriber traffic in production paths.
  • Compare deployed software against Cisco advisory affected-release information.
  • Review billing and traffic classification records for unexplained HTTP discrepancies.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3244 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3244Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco ASR 5000 Series Softwaren/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.