LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3164: Cisco ESA, Cisco WSA, and Cisco SMA GUI Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA), Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA), and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance (SMA) could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause high CPU usage on an affected device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of specific HTTP request headers. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malformed HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to trigger a prolonged status of high CPU utilization relative to the GUI process(es). Upon successful exploitation of this vulnerability, an affected device will still be operative, but its response time and overall performance may be degraded.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an unauthenticated remote attacker slow affected Cisco security appliances by forcing high CPU use in the web management GUI. The appliance should remain operational, but management responsiveness and overall performance may degrade, which can disrupt security operations during an attack or incident.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate operational resilience issue. It is not described as data theft or full device compromise, but it can degrade security appliance performance. Escalate priority if management interfaces are reachable from the internet or critical monitoring depends on these appliances.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3164 affects Cisco AsyncOS web-based management interfaces for ESA, WSA, and SMA. Improper validation of specific HTTP request headers allows malformed HTTP requests to trigger prolonged high CPU utilization in GUI processes. CVSS 3.0 is 5.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Cisco ESA, WSA, or SMA management GUIs are reachable from untrusted networks. The source bundle does not specify affected AsyncOS versions or configurations beyond the product families and web-based management interface.

Exploitation context

The source bundle reports unauthenticated remote exploitability for denial of service. It does not show CISA KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit availability, or confirmed in-the-wild campaigns.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports CWE-20 improper input validation in HTTP header handling for Cisco AsyncOS GUI services. Affected version and fix details are not included in the provided bundle, so validation should be tied to Cisco’s advisory rather than inferred product version ranges.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Cisco advisory for fixed AsyncOS releases and official workarounds.
  • Inventory Cisco ESA, WSA, and SMA appliances in your environment.
  • Restrict management GUI access to trusted administrative networks where possible.
  • Monitor affected appliances for sustained GUI process CPU spikes.
  • Prioritize remediation for internet-reachable management interfaces.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether ESA, WSA, or SMA appliances are deployed.
  • Identify AsyncOS versions and compare them with Cisco advisory guidance.
  • Check whether the web management GUI is exposed beyond trusted administrators.
  • Review device CPU and GUI responsiveness trends for DoS symptoms.
  • Check logs for malformed HTTP requests targeting management interfaces.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3164 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3164Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Web Security Appliance (WSA)unspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.