LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-3135: Cisco Unified Communications Manager Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the targeted user.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco Unified Communications Manager has a CSRF flaw in its web management interface. If an administrator is tricked into opening a malicious link while using the interface, an attacker could make changes using that administrator's permissions. This is a medium-severity integrity risk, not evidence of data theft or service outage by itself.

Executive priority

Treat this as a prioritized maintenance and access-control issue for voice infrastructure. It is not currently supported as an emergency exploitation event in the provided sources, but successful abuse could change UCM settings with administrator-level impact.

Technical view

CVE-2020-3135 is CWE-352 in Cisco UCM's web-based management interface, caused by insufficient CSRF protections. The CVSS 3.0 score is 6.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, required user interaction, and high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running affected Cisco Unified Communications Manager instances where privileged users access the web management interface. The bundle does not identify affected version ranges, so teams need Cisco's advisory and local asset data to determine exposure.

Exploitation context

The documented path requires social engineering: persuading a user of the management interface to follow a malicious link. The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the Cisco advisory and CVE record. Version granularity, fixed-release details, and workarounds are not present in the supplied bundle. Avoid claiming exploitation in the wild without additional cited evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco's advisory for affected releases, fixed software, or vendor workarounds.
  • Restrict UCM management interface access to trusted administrative networks or VPN paths.
  • Use least-privilege administrative accounts for routine UCM management tasks.
  • Warn administrators against opening unsolicited links while authenticated to UCM.
  • Monitor UCM administrative audit logs for unexpected configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Cisco Unified Communications Manager deployments and exposed management interfaces.
  • Compare installed UCM versions against Cisco's advisory and internal patch records.
  • Confirm management access is limited to intended administrative sources.
  • Review recent administrative actions for unexpected changes by legitimate users.
  • Verify privileged users understand CSRF and link-handling risks.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-3135 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-3135Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Unified Communications Managern/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.