LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-29030: Insufficient CSRF guards

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in web GUI of Secomea GateManager allows an attacker to execute malicious code. This issue affects: Secomea GateManager All versions prior to 9.4.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Secomea GateManager before version 9.4 has insufficient CSRF protection in its web GUI. A successful attack could let an attacker cause high-impact changes or code execution through a user interaction path. Organizations using GateManager should treat this as a high-priority remediation item.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any operational or remote-access environments using GateManager before 9.4. The vulnerability has high integrity and availability impact, and GateManager’s role can make unauthorized administrative actions operationally significant. No active exploitation evidence is provided in the bundle.

Technical view

CVE-2020-29030 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in the GateManager web GUI affecting all versions prior to 9.4. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.1, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction. Reported impacts are high integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Secomea GateManager web GUI is deployed on versions earlier than 9.4, especially if administrators access it through browsers from less controlled networks. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, deployment counts, or internet exposure details.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates user interaction is required and attacker privileges are not required. CSRF risk commonly depends on a targeted user reaching attacker-controlled content while authenticated to the vulnerable GUI.

Researcher notes

Available evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, CWE classification, affected range, and Secomea advisory reference. Do not assume affected subcomponents, exploit maturity, or compensating controls beyond those sources. Focus validation on version, web GUI exposure, administrative access paths, and evidence of unexpected GUI-driven changes.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Secomea GateManager instances and record exact versions.
  • Upgrade GateManager instances earlier than 9.4 to version 9.4 or later.
  • Review Secomea’s cybersecurity advisory for any environment-specific guidance.
  • Restrict administrative GUI access to trusted networks and users where feasible.
  • Review administrative audit logs for unexpected changes or code-related actions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm each GateManager instance reports version 9.4 or later.
  • Verify the web GUI is not broadly reachable beyond intended administrators.
  • Check change records for completed GateManager upgrade activity.
  • Review access logs for suspicious administrator sessions or unexpected state changes.
  • Confirm vulnerability scanners or asset tools no longer flag CVE-2020-29030.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-29030 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H2.85.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-29030Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SecomeaGateManagerAllListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.