LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-28859: OpenAsset Digital Asset Management (DAM) through 12.0.19 does not correctly sanitize user supplied input in...

OpenAsset Digital Asset Management (DAM) through 12.0.19 does not correctly sanitize user supplied input in multiple parameters and endpoints, allowing for reflected cross-site scripting attacks.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenAsset DAM through version 12.0.19 has reflected cross-site scripting in multiple inputs. An attacker could abuse vulnerable pages to make a user’s browser run unintended script in an OpenAsset context. Business urgency depends on whether OpenAsset is exposed to untrusted users and how sensitive logged-in sessions are.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted web-application risk, not an emergency based on current evidence. Prioritize remediation for externally reachable OpenAsset instances and environments used by administrators or sensitive asset-management teams.

Technical view

The CVE describes insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input across multiple OpenAsset DAM parameters and endpoints, enabling reflected XSS. The bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, endpoint names, authentication requirements, proof-of-concept details, or a named fixed version.

Likely exposure

Organizations running OpenAsset Digital Asset Management through 12.0.19 may be exposed. Risk is higher for internet-accessible deployments or users with privileged OpenAsset sessions. The provided sources do not identify affected endpoints or access prerequisites.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV is false, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. Reflected XSS typically depends on a victim interacting with attacker-controlled input, with impact shaped by session privileges and browser protections.

Researcher notes

Public evidence is sparse. The CVE names reflected XSS across multiple parameters and endpoints but does not include endpoint identifiers, authentication context, impact scoring, or a specific patch version in the supplied bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OpenAsset vendor guidance for the fixed release or supported mitigation.
  • Upgrade OpenAsset if the vendor provides a version newer than the vulnerable range.
  • Restrict untrusted access to OpenAsset until remediation is complete.
  • Review Content Security Policy and session cookie protections as defense in depth.
  • Warn users not to follow unexpected OpenAsset links during remediation.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenAsset deployments and confirm whether versions are through 12.0.19.
  • Review the vendor advisory for affected parameters and endpoints.
  • Use authorized, non-destructive testing to confirm input is safely encoded.
  • Check web logs for suspicious reflected-input patterns involving OpenAsset routes.
  • Retest after upgrade or mitigation to verify reflected script execution is blocked.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-28859 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.