LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-28605: Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGA...

Multiple code execution vulnerabilities exists in the Nef polygon-parsing functionality of CGAL libcgal CGAL-5.1.1. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to an out-of-bounds read and type confusion, which could lead to code execution. An attacker can provide malicious input to trigger any of these vulnerabilities. An oob read exists in Nef_2/PM_io_parser.h PM_io_parser<PMDEC>::read_hedge() e->set_vertex().

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CGAL is a computational geometry library used inside other software. This flaw affects CGAL 5.1.1 parsing of malformed Nef polygon data. If an exposed application processes attacker-supplied geometry files with the vulnerable parser, memory corruption could lead to code execution.

Executive priority

Treat as high urgency where CGAL parsing is reachable by users or automated ingestion. For internal-only trusted workflows, urgency is lower but patching remains important because impact is potential code execution.

Technical view

The issue is an out-of-bounds read and type confusion in Nef_2/PM_io_parser.h, specifically PM_io_parser<PMDEC>::read_hedge() e->set_vertex(). Sources describe specially crafted malformed input as the trigger and possible code execution as the impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in software embedding libcgal CGAL-5.1.1 and accepting untrusted geometry, CAD, mesh, or polygon input. Internet-facing import or conversion services would be higher priority than offline trusted workflows.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. TALOS describes malicious input as sufficient to trigger the vulnerability, but no exploit-in-the-wild evidence is provided here.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for CGAL 5.1.1 and the named parser function. The bundle does not provide comprehensive downstream product mapping or a confirmed fixed upstream version, so validation should focus on dependency inventory and vendor advisories.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and packages using CGAL/libcgal 5.1.1.
  • Apply relevant vendor or distribution security updates for CGAL/libcgal.
  • Prioritize Debian systems covered by DLA 3226-1 where applicable.
  • Prioritize Gentoo systems covered by GLSA-202305-34 where applicable.
  • Restrict or sandbox untrusted geometry file parsing until patched.
  • Check vendor guidance if fixed package versions are unclear.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed CGAL/libcgal versions against asset inventory and SBOMs.
  • Identify services that parse Nef polygon or geometry files from users.
  • Verify distribution security advisories are applied on affected hosts.
  • Review import pipelines for unauthenticated or automated file processing.
  • Check crash telemetry around geometry parsing without using untrusted proofs-of-concept.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-129: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-28605 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

10Critical
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-28605Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CGAL ProjectlibcgalCGAL-5.1.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-129 · source CWE mapping

Improper Validation of Array Index

Improper Validation of Array Index represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.