LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-28600: An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the import_stl.cc:import_stl() functionality of Openscad ope...

An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the import_stl.cc:import_stl() functionality of Openscad openscad-2020.12-RC2. A specially crafted STL file can lead to code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2 has a memory corruption flaw when importing STL files. A malicious STL file could cause code execution if a user opens or imports it. This is mainly a file-handling risk for CAD users who receive models from outside trusted channels.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for engineering or CAD environments that handle external models. The business risk is code execution from a file a user opens, not broad internet-wide exposure.

Technical view

CVE-2020-28600 is an out-of-bounds write in OpenSCAD import_stl.cc import_stl(). The CVSS 3.0 score is 8.8 with user interaction required. Sources state a specially crafted STL file can trigger code execution. The provided affected version is OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OpenSCAD 2020.12-RC2 is installed and users import STL files from email, shared drives, downloads, customers, vendors, or public model repositories.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires convincing a user or workflow to process a malicious STL file in the affected OpenSCAD version.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies one affected release candidate and the vulnerable import_stl path. Do not expand scope to other OpenSCAD versions without additional vendor or advisory evidence. No exploit-in-the-wild evidence is provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory OpenSCAD installations and identify any 2020.12-RC2 usage.
  • Do not import untrusted STL files with affected OpenSCAD builds.
  • Check OpenSCAD and Talos guidance for fixed or safe versions.
  • Prefer trusted model sources until remediation is confirmed.
  • Isolate affected CAD workstations from sensitive systems where practical.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed OpenSCAD version on CAD and engineering endpoints.
  • Review whether users import STL files from external or untrusted sources.
  • Check endpoint telemetry for unexpected crashes during STL imports.
  • Verify remediation against vendor or Talos guidance before closing.
  • Document remaining exceptions and compensating controls.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-28600 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-28600Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aOpenscadOpenscad openscad-2020.12-RC2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.