CVE-2020-28388: A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), APOGEE PXC Comp...
A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), APOGEE PXC Compact (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.20), APOGEE PXC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), APOGEE PXC Modular (P2 Ethernet) (All versions < V2.8.20), Nucleus NET (All versions < V5.2), Nucleus ReadyStart V3 (All versions < V2012.12), Nucleus Source Code (All versions), PLUSCONTROL 1st Gen (All versions), TALON TC Compact (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5), TALON TC Modular (BACnet) (All versions < V3.5.5). Initial Sequence Numbers (ISNs) for TCP connections are derived from an insufficiently random source. As a result, the ISN of current and future TCP connections could be predictable. An attacker could hijack existing sessions or spoof future ones.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Some Siemens building-control and embedded networking products may use predictable TCP connection numbers. That can let a network attacker interfere with or impersonate TCP sessions, affecting integrity or availability rather than exposing data directly.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate operational technology risk. It is not described as data theft or actively exploited, but affected building-control systems may support important facility operations and should be upgraded or isolated during normal maintenance windows.
Technical view
CVE-2020-28388 is CWE-342: TCP initial sequence numbers are derived from insufficient randomness. The listed Siemens APOGEE, TALON, Nucleus, and PLUSCONTROL products could allow session hijacking or spoofing of future TCP connections. CVSS v3.1 is 6.5, network-accessible, low complexity, unauthenticated, with official remediation indicated.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to environments running the named Siemens products and affected versions, especially building automation or embedded systems reachable over IP networks. Nucleus Source Code and PLUSCONTROL are listed as all versions affected in the provided bundle.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS temporal vector indicates proof-of-concept exploit maturity, so treat this as plausible but not confirmed active exploitation.
Researcher notes
The key condition is predictable TCP ISNs, not application authentication bypass. Validation should focus on product/version exposure and network adjacency. Avoid assuming exploitability across all deployments; session spoofing feasibility depends on topology, traffic visibility, and protocol behavior.
Mitigation direction
Inventory affected Siemens APOGEE, TALON, Nucleus, and PLUSCONTROL deployments.
Upgrade products to versions outside the affected ranges where fixed versions are listed.
Check Siemens ProductCERT advisories for product-specific remediation and unsupported all-version products.
Reduce unnecessary network reachability to affected controllers and embedded systems.
Prioritize remediation where affected devices communicate across untrusted or routed networks.
Validation and detection
Confirm exact product names and firmware/software versions against the affected version list.
Check whether affected devices are reachable over TCP from user, vendor, or external networks.
Review Siemens ProductCERT advisories for remediation status per product line.
Validate that upgraded systems report fixed versions after maintenance.
Monitor for unexpected TCP session resets, spoofing indicators, or control-channel instability.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-342: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-342 · source CWE mapping
Predictable Exact Value from Previous Values
Predictable Exact Value from Previous Values represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.