LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-27832: A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay, where it has a persistent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability when d...

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay, where it has a persistent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability when displaying a repository's notification. This flaw allows an attacker to trick a user into performing a malicious action to impersonate the target user. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-27832 is a persistent XSS flaw in Red Hat Quay when repository notifications are displayed. A successful attack could make a targeted user perform an unintended action and allow impersonation. The source bundle names Quay 3.3.2, but provides no CVSS score, exploit evidence, or confirmed fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted application security issue for Quay environments, not an internet-wide emergency based on available evidence. Prioritize confirmation of affected deployments and vendor remediation, especially where Quay is used by administrators or CI/CD workflows.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 persistent cross-site scripting in Red Hat Quay repository notification display handling. Stored attacker-controlled content may execute in another user's browser when that notification is viewed, enabling actions as that user. Available evidence is limited to the CVE record and Red Hat Bugzilla reference.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to environments running Red Hat Quay, specifically Quay 3.3.2 as listed in the source bundle. Risk depends on whether untrusted users can create or influence repository notifications and whether privileged users view them.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit details, or a patch version. The described attack requires a user to view a malicious persisted notification and be tricked into an action that impersonates that user.

Researcher notes

Evidence is thin: no CVSS vector, no named fixed release, and no KEV status in the source bundle. Focus validation on affected-version confirmation, notification trust boundaries, and Red Hat's Bugzilla or advisory updates. Avoid assuming broader Quay versions are affected without vendor evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Red Hat Quay 3.3.2 deployments.
  • Check Red Hat Bugzilla and vendor guidance for fixed versions or workarounds.
  • Upgrade Quay if Red Hat identifies a corrected release.
  • Limit repository notification management to trusted users where feasible.
  • Review existing repository notifications for untrusted or unexpected content.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Quay versions across production and non-production environments.
  • Confirm whether repository notifications are enabled and user-controlled.
  • Review Red Hat guidance for this CVE before declaring remediation complete.
  • Check audit logs for suspicious repository notification changes.
  • Verify upgraded or mitigated instances no longer run Quay 3.3.2.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-27832 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aquayquay 3.3.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.