LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-27131: Cisco Security Manager Java Deserialization Vulnerabilities

Multiple vulnerabilities in the Java deserialization function that is used by Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. These vulnerabilities are due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content by the affected software. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending a malicious serialized Java object to a specific listener on an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device with the privileges of NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on the Windows target host. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco Security Manager contains Java deserialization flaws that can let an unauthenticated remote attacker run commands on the Windows host. Successful exploitation runs with NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM privileges, giving full host-level control. Cisco had not released software updates in the provided sources.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for any environment still running Cisco Security Manager. The business concern is full administrative compromise of a security management host, especially if reachable beyond a tightly controlled admin network.

Technical view

The issue is insecure deserialization of user-supplied content in Cisco Security Manager. An attacker can send a malicious serialized Java object to a specific listener. CVSS v3.1 is 8.1 with network access, no privileges, no user interaction, high impact, and high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Cisco Security Manager is deployed and its relevant listener or management network path is reachable by untrusted networks. The bundle does not identify exact affected versions or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The attack is remote and unauthenticated but rated high complexity. Successful exploitation could provide SYSTEM-level command execution on the Windows host.

Researcher notes

Core evidence is strong for unauthenticated remote command execution via Java deserialization, but the bundle lacks exact affected version ranges and does not provide confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming patch availability because the provided description says Cisco had not released updates.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Cisco advisory guidance for current fixes, workarounds, or migration direction.
  • Restrict network access to Cisco Security Manager listeners and management interfaces.
  • Place Cisco Security Manager on a trusted administrative network only.
  • Increase monitoring for unexpected process execution on the Windows host.
  • Prioritize replacement or compensating controls if no vendor update is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Cisco Security Manager deployments and hosting Windows systems.
  • Confirm whether the relevant listener is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review Cisco advisory applicability against installed product details.
  • Check endpoint and network logs for suspicious connections or command execution.
  • Document compensating controls where no vendor patch is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-27131 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-27131Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco Security Managern/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.