LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26677: Any user logged in to a vFairs 3.3 virtual conference or event can perform SQL injection with a malicious q...

Any user logged in to a vFairs 3.3 virtual conference or event can perform SQL injection with a malicious query to the API.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-26677 is an authenticated SQL injection issue reported in vFairs 3.3. A logged-in user of a virtual event could send a malicious API query. For executives, the concern is that ordinary attendees may be untrusted users, so exposure could extend beyond administrators or staff.

Executive priority

Prioritize vendor confirmation and exposure review if your organization used vFairs 3.3. The issue involves authenticated users, but event attendees can be numerous and external, making business risk potentially significant.

Technical view

The CVE record describes SQL injection through the vFairs API affecting vFairs 3.3, reachable by any logged-in conference or event user. No CVSS score, CWE, affected CPE, vendor patch, or detailed impact is provided in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Organizations using vFairs 3.3 for virtual conferences or events, especially events with broad attendee registration, may be exposed. The sources do not confirm whether hosted tenants were patched or whether other versions are affected.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided data. The sources support that exploitation requires a logged-in user and a malicious API query, but they do not establish active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The record names vFairs 3.3 and an API SQL injection condition but lacks parameters, affected CPEs, CVSS, patch references, or exploitation telemetry. Avoid broad version claims without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Ask vFairs to confirm affected version, tenant status, and remediation availability.
  • Review vendor guidance before assuming a patch or workaround exists.
  • Limit event access to necessary and trusted registrants where feasible.
  • Monitor API and application logs for SQL errors or unusual query patterns.
  • Assess whether event user or attendee data may require review.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory current and past vFairs usage and event timelines.
  • Confirm whether any deployment or tenant used vFairs 3.3.
  • Request written remediation status from vFairs or the service provider.
  • Review authentication and API logs for suspicious activity during events.
  • Document whether attendee accounts had API access paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26677 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.