LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26308: GHSL-2020-302: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in validate.js

Validate.js provides a declarative way of validating javascript objects. Versions 0.13.1 and prior contain one or more regular expressions that are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS). As of time of publication, no known patches are available.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-26308 is a denial-of-service risk in validate.js. A crafted value can make vulnerable regular expressions consume excessive CPU, potentially slowing or blocking services that validate untrusted input. Sources say versions 0.13.1 and prior are affected, and no known patch was available at publication.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority where validate.js is used in internet-facing or critical workflows. The business risk is service degradation or outage, not data theft, but the source states no known patch at publication.

Technical view

validate.js 0.13.1 and earlier contains inefficient regular expressions classified as CWE-1333. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.7 because the issue is network-reachable, unauthenticated, low-complexity, and impacts availability, not confidentiality or integrity.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in JavaScript applications or services that include ansman validate.js 0.13.1 or earlier and apply validation to user-controlled strings, API fields, forms, or imported data.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The risk is practical denial of service when untrusted input reaches vulnerable validation paths, but exploit status is not established.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports ReDoS in validate.js through vulnerable regular expressions and high availability impact. The bundle does not provide patch details, proof of exploitation, or affected downstream products, so conclusions should remain limited to ansman validate.js.

Mitigation direction

  • Check vendor advisory and GitHub issue for current patch or maintainer guidance.
  • Inventory direct and transitive use of validate.js across applications.
  • Replace or remove affected validate.js versions where feasible.
  • Reduce exposure of vulnerable validation paths to untrusted long input.
  • Use operational DoS controls such as request limits and monitoring where replacement is delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Review package manifests, lockfiles, and SBOMs for validate.js versions 0.13.1 or earlier.
  • Trace whether affected validation code processes externally supplied input.
  • Confirm whether vulnerable paths run server-side or in business-critical workflows.
  • Monitor CPU saturation, request latency, and validation error spikes around exposed endpoints.
  • Re-check the linked advisory and issue for updated patch status before closure.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26308 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Green

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:GreenPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-26308Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Green

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ansmanvalidate.js0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.