LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26305: GHSL-2020-291: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in CommonRegexJS

CommonRegexJS is a CommonRegex port for JavaScript. All available versions contain one or more regular expressions that are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS). As of time of publication, no known patches are available.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CommonRegexJS can be made to spend excessive CPU time when processing specially crafted input. For an exposed service, that can degrade or interrupt availability without authentication. The sources say all available versions were affected and no known patch was available at publication.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for internet-facing or business-critical services using CommonRegexJS. The main business risk is service degradation or outage, and the source bundle states no known patch existed at publication.

Technical view

This is a Regular Expression Denial of Service issue in CommonRegexJS, tracked as CWE-1333. Vulnerable expressions can exhibit excessive backtracking on malicious input. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.7 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high vulnerable-system availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Node.js or JavaScript applications that depend on CommonRegexJS and run its parsers against untrusted or public user input, such as forms, API fields, logs, or text-processing workflows.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. They support denial-of-service risk through crafted input, but do not establish observed exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for vulnerability class, affected library, and availability impact. Evidence is incomplete on active exploitation and final remediation state. Validate actual reachability in each application before assigning incident-level urgency.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and packages that include CommonRegexJS.
  • Check the GitHub issue and GHSL advisory for current vendor guidance.
  • Avoid using CommonRegexJS on untrusted input until a safe path is confirmed.
  • Limit accepted input size before text is processed by this dependency.
  • Prioritize replacement if the package remains unpatched.

Validation and detection

  • Search dependency manifests and lockfiles for CommonRegexJS.
  • Confirm whether reachable routes pass user-controlled text into this library.
  • Review public forms, APIs, and background text-processing jobs for exposure.
  • Track whether any maintained patch, fork, or replacement is adopted.
  • Verify availability monitoring covers CPU saturation and request latency.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1333: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26305 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Green

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:GreenPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-26305Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/U:Green

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
talyssonocCommonRegexJS0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1333 · source CWE mapping

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.