LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26241: Shallow copy bug in geth

Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. This is a Consensus vulnerability in Geth before version 1.9.17 which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth's pre-compiled dataCopy (at 0x00...04) contract did a shallow copy on invocation. An attacker could deploy a contract that writes X to an EVM memory region R, then calls 0x00..04 with R as an argument, then overwrites R to Y, and finally invokes the RETURNDATACOPY opcode. When this contract is invoked, a consensus-compliant node would push X on the EVM stack, whereas Geth would push Y. This is fixed in version 1.9.17.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Geth versions 1.9.7 through before 1.9.17 could disagree with other Ethereum clients about valid chain state. A malicious smart contract could trigger a consensus mismatch, causing vulnerable nodes to reject the canonical chain. For organizations relying on affected Geth nodes, the business risk is incorrect chain view and service disruption, not data theft.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted infrastructure integrity issue. It is not marked as exploited, but affected Geth nodes could follow the wrong chain view. Upgrade or verify versions promptly where Ethereum node correctness supports revenue, custody, trading, compliance, or customer-facing services.

Technical view

CVE-2020-26241 is a CWE-682 consensus flaw in go-ethereum. The dataCopy precompile performed a shallow copy, so Geth could place different data on the EVM stack than consensus-compliant nodes after return-data copying. Affected versions are >=1.9.7 and <1.9.17; fixed in 1.9.17.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Ethereum infrastructure running Geth versions >=1.9.7 and <1.9.17. Nodes upgraded to 1.9.17 or later are not described as affected. The bundle does not name other clients, forks, managed services, or hosted node providers as affected.

Exploitation context

The sources describe a feasible network-reachable, low-complexity consensus attack requiring privileges to deploy or invoke a malicious contract. KEV is false, and the provided sources do not state active exploitation. The impact is integrity of chain consensus, not confidentiality or direct availability loss.

Researcher notes

The key exposure condition is running vulnerable go-ethereum versions. The bug is consensus-relevant because Geth could produce different EVM stack data than compliant nodes. Evidence supports the version range and fixed release, but not active exploitation, affected managed providers, or non-Geth products.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade go-ethereum Geth to version 1.9.17 or later.
  • Identify and retire any remaining Geth versions from 1.9.7 through 1.9.16.
  • Review Ethereum Foundation and go-ethereum advisory guidance before operating exposed nodes.
  • Prioritize externally connected validators, archive nodes, RPC backends, and transaction-processing infrastructure.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Ethereum nodes and record their exact Geth versions.
  • Confirm no production node reports Geth 1.9.7 through 1.9.16.
  • Check deployment images, automation, and rollback versions for vulnerable Geth builds.
  • Verify monitoring would detect peers rejecting the canonical chain unexpectedly.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-682: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26241 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-26241Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ethereumgo-ethereum>= 1.9.7, < 1.9.17Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-682 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Calculation

Incorrect Calculation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.