LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26213: Denial of Service in teler

In teler before version 0.0.1, if you run teler inside a Docker container and encounter `errors.Exit` function, it will cause denial-of-service (`SIGSEGV`) because it doesn't get process ID and process group ID of teler properly to kills. The issue is patched in teler 0.0.1 and 0.0.1-dev5.1.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-26213 can crash vulnerable teler deployments when teler runs inside Docker and hits a specific error-exit path. The impact is service availability, not data theft or tampering. The vendor advisory says the issue is fixed in teler 0.0.1 and 0.0.1-dev5.1.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate availability risk. It should not displace critical remote code execution fixes, but it matters where teler supports production monitoring, detection, or edge traffic visibility. Patch during the next operational maintenance window, sooner for critical Docker deployments.

Technical view

teler before 0.0.1 has a CWE-476 denial-of-service flaw tied to errors.Exit in Docker. The process and process group IDs are not obtained correctly before kill handling, resulting in SIGSEGV. CVSS 3.1 is 5.9: network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running kitabisa teler versions earlier than 0.0.1 inside Docker containers. The sources do not indicate exposure for non-Docker deployments or other products. Prioritize internet-facing or availability-critical teler deployments first.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided sources do not report active exploitation. The CVSS vector allows network reachability but rates attack complexity high. Evidence supports a denial-of-service condition, not confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Researcher notes

The source evidence is concise and vendor-confirmed. Key constraints are Docker deployment and the errors.Exit path. No exploit details, broad impact claims, or active exploitation evidence are present in the supplied bundle. Validation should focus on version, containerization, and crash telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade teler to 0.0.1 or 0.0.1-dev5.1 or later.
  • Prioritize Docker-based teler deployments first.
  • Check vendor guidance before applying compensating controls.
  • Monitor vulnerable containers for unexpected SIGSEGV crashes.
  • Plan rollback-safe updates for availability-critical monitoring paths.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory teler deployments and record versions.
  • Confirm whether each teler instance runs inside Docker.
  • Verify upgraded instances report version 0.0.1 or later.
  • Review container crash history for SIGSEGV events.
  • Confirm no unsupported pre-0.0.1 images remain deployed.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-476: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26213 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.23.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-26213Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
kitabisateler< 0.0.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-476 · source CWE mapping

NULL Pointer Dereference

NULL Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.