LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26148: md_push_block_bytes in md4c.c in md4c 0.4.5 allows attackers to trigger use of uninitialized memory, and ca...

md_push_block_bytes in md4c.c in md4c 0.4.5 allows attackers to trigger use of uninitialized memory, and cause a denial of service (e.g., assertion failure) via a malformed Markdown document.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-26148 is a denial-of-service issue in md4c 0.4.5, a Markdown parsing component. A malformed Markdown document can trigger use of uninitialized memory and cause an assertion failure. Business risk depends on whether an application parses untrusted Markdown with this version.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted availability risk, not a confirmed breach indicator. Prioritize systems that parse public or customer-controlled Markdown, especially where parser crashes could disrupt a service or workflow.

Technical view

The reported flaw is in md_push_block_bytes in md4c.c in md4c 0.4.5. Source data describes use of uninitialized memory leading to denial of service, including assertion failure, via malformed Markdown input. No CVSS score, CWE, exploit status, or vendor fix details are provided in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in services, desktop apps, CMS features, documentation tools, or developer platforms that embed md4c 0.4.5 and parse Markdown from untrusted users or external files.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and CISA KEV is false. The described attack condition is supplying malformed Markdown to a vulnerable parser path, with the supported impact limited to denial of service.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the CVE record names md4c 0.4.5, md_push_block_bytes, uninitialized memory, and denial of service. It does not provide CVSS, CWE, confirmed exploit activity, or remediation details. Avoid expanding scope beyond md4c without local dependency evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory applications and dependencies for md4c 0.4.5 usage.
  • Check md4c project guidance and issue history for fixed versions or recommended patches.
  • Avoid parsing untrusted Markdown with vulnerable builds until remediated.
  • Run Markdown parsing in a constrained worker where crashes do not stop core services.
  • Add monitoring for parser crashes or assertion failures tied to Markdown input.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether md4c is present directly or through bundled application code.
  • Identify any routes or workflows that parse user-supplied Markdown.
  • Review dependency lockfiles, build artifacts, and vendor notices for md4c version evidence.
  • Check logs for assertion failures or crashes in Markdown parsing paths.
  • Verify remediation by confirming md4c is no longer at the vulnerable version.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26148 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.