LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-26079: Cisco IoT Field Network Director Unprotected Storage of Credentials Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web UI of Cisco IoT Field Network Director (FND) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain hashes of user passwords on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient protection of user credentials. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in as an administrative user and crafting a call for user information. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain hashes of user passwords on an affected device.

MediumCVSS 4.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Cisco IoT Field Network Director could let a logged-in administrative user retrieve password hashes through the web UI. This is not described as unauthenticated or actively exploited, but exposed hashes can support follow-on credential attacks if an admin account is compromised.

Executive priority

Treat as moderate priority. It is most urgent where IoT-FND administration is broadly reachable, privileged accounts are shared, or admin compromise is suspected. It does not currently justify emergency response based on the provided evidence alone.

Technical view

CVE-2020-26079 is an insufficient credential protection issue in Cisco IoT-FND web UI, mapped to CWE-256. The CVSS 3.0 score is 4.1 with network access, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Cisco IoT Field Network Director. The source bundle does not identify affected version numbers, so teams must compare deployed releases against Cisco guidance.

Exploitation context

The provided sources describe exploitation by an authenticated remote attacker with administrative privileges. KEV status is false, and the bundle provides no cited evidence of active exploitation or public exploit use.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is version scope: the bundle lists affected versions as n/a. The issue requires administrative privileges, so validation should focus on product presence, access control, privileged account hygiene, and Cisco advisory status rather than unauthenticated exploit assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Cisco advisory for affected releases and fixed software guidance.
  • Restrict IoT-FND administrative web UI access to trusted management networks.
  • Audit administrative accounts and remove unnecessary privileged access.
  • After vendor remediation, consider password resets for exposed IoT-FND users.
  • Monitor logs for unusual administrative access patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Cisco IoT-FND is deployed.
  • Identify installed IoT-FND versions and compare with Cisco guidance.
  • Verify administrative web UI is not broadly reachable.
  • Review logs for unexpected administrative sessions.
  • Check whether privileged accounts are limited to required personnel.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-256: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-26079 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.1 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.1CVSS 3.0MediumCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N2.31.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.0 score

4.1Medium
CVSS 3.0 vector shape for CVE-2020-26079Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CiscoCisco IoT Field Network Director (IoT-FND)n/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-256 · source CWE mapping

Plaintext Storage of a Password

Plaintext Storage of a Password represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.