LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-25738: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 11.1.0.173 allows attackers to bypass a Credential Theft protecti...

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 11.1.0.173 allows attackers to bypass a Credential Theft protection mechanism by injecting a DLL into a process that normally has credential access, such as a Chrome process that reads credentials from a SQLite database.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes a weakness in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager where a credential-theft protection control could be bypassed. If an organization relied on that control, affected endpoints may have had less protection against credential access than expected. Public source data does not provide a CVSS score, confirmed fix, or active exploitation evidence.

Executive priority

If CyberArk EPM 11.1.0.173 is present, prioritize vendor-guided remediation and validation because this affects a credential-protection control. If that version is not present, track as low immediate urgency but keep evidence in the vulnerability record due to incomplete public scoring.

Technical view

The CVE description states that CyberArk EPM 11.1.0.173 allowed bypass of a Credential Theft protection mechanism by injecting a DLL into a process that normally has credential access, such as Chrome reading stored credentials. The bundle does not include CWE, CVSS, vendor advisory details, or tested affected ranges beyond the named version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely limited to environments running CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager 11.1.0.173 with Credential Theft protection enabled. The source bundle’s affected-product fields are incomplete, so teams should verify deployments and versions directly rather than assuming broader or narrower impact.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. A public gist is referenced, but the bundle does not provide enough detail to assess real-world use. Treat this as a control-bypass risk that could matter most on endpoints where credential stores are accessible.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE record names CyberArk EPM 11.1.0.173 and a credential-theft protection bypass, but the bundle lacks CVSS, CWE, complete affected CPEs, vendor fix text, and exploitation confirmation. Avoid extrapolating to other CyberArk versions without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check CyberArk guidance for fixed versions or supported mitigations.
  • Inventory endpoints running CyberArk EPM and identify version 11.1.0.173.
  • Prioritize review where Credential Theft protection is relied on for browser credential defense.
  • Restrict local administrative rights and unnecessary process injection paths where feasible.
  • Monitor endpoint telemetry for suspicious access to browser credential stores.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether CyberArk EPM 11.1.0.173 exists in managed endpoint inventory.
  • Verify Credential Theft protection policy status on endpoints using EPM.
  • Review CyberArk release notes or support advisories for remediation direction.
  • Check EDR logs for unusual module loads into credential-accessing applications.
  • Document whether browser credential storage is allowed or centrally disabled.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-25738 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.