LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-2509: Command Injection Vulnerability in QTS and QuTS hero

A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later QTS 4.5.1.1495 Build 20201123 and later QTS 4.3.6.1620 Build 20210322 and later QTS 4.3.4.1632 Build 20210324 and later QTS 4.3.3.1624 Build 20210416 and later QTS 4.2.6 Build 20210327 and later QuTS hero h4.5.1.1491 build 20201119 and later

CriticalCVSS 9.8Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-2509 is a critical command injection flaw in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could run commands through the vulnerable application, potentially taking full control of the NAS. CISA lists it as known exploited, so exposed unpatched systems should be treated as urgent.

Executive priority

Treat this as an immediate remediation item for any QNAP NAS still below the fixed versions. The combination of unauthenticated remote command execution, full impact, and CISA KEV listing creates material business risk, especially where NAS devices store sensitive or operational data.

Technical view

The vulnerability maps to CWE-77/CWE-78 command injection and carries CVSS 3.1 score 9.8. The vector is network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. QNAP fixed it across multiple QTS 4.x branches and QuTS hero h4.5.1.

Likely exposure

Organizations using QNAP NAS devices running QTS or QuTS hero before the fixed builds are potentially exposed. Risk is highest where NAS administration or affected application services are reachable from untrusted networks. The source bundle does not identify specific vulnerable components beyond QTS and QuTS hero.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV inclusion indicates exploitation has been observed in the wild. The provided sources do not describe current campaign volume, exploited endpoints, or public exploit availability. The technical profile means successful exploitation could provide arbitrary command execution without authentication or user interaction.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for affected products, impact class, fixed builds, CVSS severity, and KEV status. Evidence is incomplete for exact vulnerable endpoints, exploit mechanics, and current exploitation campaigns. Validation should focus on version/build confirmation and exposure mapping rather than offensive testing.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade QTS to the fixed build for the installed 4.x branch or later.
  • Upgrade QuTS hero to h4.5.1.1491 build 20201119 or later.
  • Prioritize internet-reachable QNAP systems and high-value storage environments first.
  • Check QNAP advisory QSA-21-05 for branch-specific guidance before accepting residual risk.
  • Remove or restrict untrusted network access until affected systems are confirmed fixed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all QNAP NAS devices and record QTS or QuTS hero versions and build numbers.
  • Compare each system against the fixed builds listed in QNAP QSA-21-05.
  • Confirm vulnerability management tooling flags CVE-2020-2509 and CISA KEV status.
  • Validate remediation using authenticated version checks, not exploit attempts.
  • Review external exposure for QNAP services during remediation prioritization.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-2509 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-2509Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QNAP Systems Inc.QTSunspecified, unspecified, unspecified, unspecified, unspecified, unspecifiedListed
QNAP Systems Inc.QuTS herounspecifiedListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.