LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-23592: A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows...

A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to Reset ONU to Factory Default through ' /mgm_dev_reset.asp.' Resetting to default leads to Escalation of Privileges by logging-in with default credentials.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw could let an unauthenticated remote attacker trigger a factory reset on a specific OPTILINK ONU model through a CSRF condition. After reset, the device may accept default credentials, creating a path to unauthorized administrative access and service disruption.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for exposed or business-critical OPTILINK ONU devices because compromise may combine outage risk with administrative takeover. Treat as high urgency when devices support customer connectivity, branch access, or managed network services.

Technical view

CVE-2020-23592 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N hardware V2.2, firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028. The reported reset endpoint is /mgm_dev_reset.asp. CVSS 3.1 is 8.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations using OPTILINK OP-XT71000N hardware V2.2 with firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028, especially where the web management interface is reachable from user networks. The CVE metadata lists affected vendor/product as n/a, so broader product coverage is not confirmed by the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The scenario requires user interaction consistent with CSRF. Impact comes from forced factory reset and subsequent access using default credentials, according to the CVE description.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow and based on the CVE record plus the linked public GitHub reference. The sources identify the vulnerable endpoint and reset-to-default impact, but do not provide vendor-confirmed patch status, affected CPEs, or exploitation-in-the-wild evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OPTILINK or device-provider guidance for fixed firmware or official mitigations.
  • Remove management interfaces from untrusted networks and internet exposure.
  • Change default credentials and verify they do not work after reset recovery.
  • Restrict administration to trusted management networks or VPN access.
  • Monitor for unexpected factory resets or configuration loss.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OP-XT71000N devices and record hardware and firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028 is present.
  • Verify management access is limited to trusted administrative paths.
  • Review logs or monitoring for unexpected reset events.
  • Check whether default credentials are disabled after recovery procedures.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-23592 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-23592Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.