LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-23589: A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows...

A vulnerability in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028 allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack to cause a Denial of Service by Rebooting the router through " /mgm_dev_reboot.asp."

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue could let an attacker trick a user into causing a vulnerable OPTILINK OP-XT71000N router to reboot. The business impact is availability disruption, not data theft, based on the provided sources. It requires user interaction and applies to the specific hardware and firmware named in the CVE description.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate availability risk. Prioritize sites where the named router supports business-critical connectivity or has management exposed beyond a small admin network. It does not currently justify emergency response absent evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

CVE-2020-23589 is a CWE-352 cross-site request forgery issue in OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware V2.2 with Firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028. The cited impact is denial of service through router reboot. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to the named OPTILINK OP-XT71000N hardware and firmware. Risk is higher where the router management interface is reachable from user workstations or less trusted networks. The source bundle does not identify broader affected products or versions.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The vulnerability requires user interaction consistent with CSRF. Public reference material exists, but the sources provided do not establish widespread exploitation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow: one CVE record, CVE List data, and a public GitHub reference. The CVE names the vulnerable model and firmware, but structured affected-product fields are not populated. Avoid assuming other OPTILINK models are affected without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OPTILINK or reseller guidance for firmware updates or official workarounds.
  • Restrict router administration access to trusted management networks or VPN paths.
  • Block management interfaces from untrusted user segments and the public internet.
  • Limit administrator browsing from systems that can reach router management pages.
  • Monitor vulnerable routers for unexpected reboot or availability events.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OPTILINK OP-XT71000N routers and record hardware and firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether Firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028 is deployed.
  • Review network paths to router management interfaces from user and guest networks.
  • Check device logs or monitoring for unexplained reboot patterns.
  • Track vendor advisories for patch or mitigation confirmation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-23589 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-23589Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.