LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-23585: A remote attacker can conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware V...

A remote attacker can conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on OPTILINK OP-XT71000N Hardware Version: V2.2 , Firmware Version: OP_V3.3.1-191028. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the "mgm_config_file.asp" because of which attacker can create a crafted "csrf form" which sends " malicious xml data" to "/boaform/admin/formMgmConfigUpload". the exploit allows attacker to "gain full privileges" and to "fully compromise of router & network".

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-23585 is a high-severity CSRF issue reported in an OPTILINK OP-XT71000N router firmware build. If an administrator is tricked into interacting with attacker-controlled content while authenticated, router configuration could be changed, potentially compromising the device and connected network.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for organizations using the named router, especially in branch, ISP-managed, or small-office environments. Prioritize exposure reduction and vendor confirmation because compromise could affect network control.

Technical view

The CVE describes insufficient CSRF protection on the router management configuration upload workflow. The published record assigns CVSS 3.1 score 8.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and user interaction required. The affected narrative names hardware V2.2 and firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028, but structured vendor/product fields are incomplete.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OPTILINK OP-XT71000N administration is reachable by users browsing the web, especially from LAN clients. Internet-exposed management would increase business risk, but the bundle does not confirm exposure prevalence.

Exploitation context

The bundle includes a public GitHub reference, but CISA KEV status is false and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, likely involving an authenticated administrator session.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited: the CVE text names a specific hardware and firmware version, while structured affected product data is n/a. Avoid broad product assumptions. Validate against real device firmware and vendor information before declaring fleet impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OPTILINK or service-provider guidance for fixed firmware or replacement direction.
  • Restrict router administration to trusted management networks and administrators only.
  • Disable remote administration if it is not operationally required.
  • Review device configuration for unauthorized changes after suspected exposure.
  • Replace unsupported devices if no vendor fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OPTILINK OP-XT71000N devices and record hardware and firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether firmware OP_V3.3.1-191028 is present.
  • Verify administrative interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review recent router configuration changes and administrator activity.
  • Track vendor advisories because the source bundle names no official patch.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-23585 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-23585Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.