LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-23363: Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in Verytops Verydows all versions that allows an atta...

Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in Verytops Verydows all versions that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-23363 is a high-severity CSRF issue in Verytops Verydows. The CVE states all versions are affected and that a crafted script could lead to arbitrary code execution. The public bundle does not identify a fixed version, affected endpoint, or vendor mitigation.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority if Verydows is present, especially on reachable administrative surfaces. The potential impact is severe, but urgency depends on confirmed deployment and exposure because public evidence is incomplete and no active exploitation is cited.

Technical view

The CVE is classified as CWE-352 with CVSS 3.1 score 8.8. The vector indicates network access, low attack complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, unchanged scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Source detail is sparse beyond the GitHub issue reference.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Verytops Verydows. The source bundle lists affected vendor and product fields as n/a, but the description says Verydows all versions. Confirm whether any internet-facing or internally reachable Verydows instances exist.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction according to the CVSS vector. Public details do not establish exploit maturity, affected endpoint, victim role, or whether authentication context is required.

Researcher notes

Do not assume a patch, endpoint, or exploit status from the available bundle. Key gaps are affected package identifiers, exact vulnerable flow, required victim privileges, fixed version, and official remediation. Validate findings only in authorized environments.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify and restrict access to any Verydows deployments.
  • Check vendor or project guidance for fixed versions or official mitigations.
  • Prioritize CSRF protections on state-changing Verydows actions.
  • Use network controls to limit administrative access paths.
  • Monitor for unexpected administrative or code-execution-related activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Verydows instances and confirm exposed interfaces.
  • Review the GitHub issue and CVE records for affected-version details.
  • Confirm anti-CSRF controls on state-changing requests in staging.
  • Check whether vendor guidance names a fixed release.
  • Review logs for suspicious state changes or administrative actions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-23363 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-23363Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.