LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-21843: A heap based buffer overflow vulnerability exits in GNU LibreDWG 0.10 via bit_read_RC ../../src/bits.c:318.

A heap based buffer overflow vulnerability exits in GNU LibreDWG 0.10 via bit_read_RC ../../src/bits.c:318.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-21843 describes a heap-based buffer overflow in GNU LibreDWG 0.10. Business risk depends on whether the organization processes DWG files with that library, especially files received from users, partners, or the internet. The source bundle does not provide severity scoring, confirmed impact, or a fixed version.

Executive priority

Prioritize assessment if DWG files from outside the organization are parsed automatically. Without known exploitation, CVSS, or a named fix in the sources, this should be handled as a focused exposure-validation task rather than an emergency by default.

Technical view

The CVE record states that GNU LibreDWG 0.10 contains a heap-based buffer overflow in bit_read_RC at ../../src/bits.c:318. The provided data does not include CVSS, CWE mapping, exploitability details, affected CPEs, or remediation metadata. Treat this as a file-parsing memory-safety issue until upstream guidance clarifies impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where GNU LibreDWG 0.10 parses DWG files, including conversion, import, inspection, indexing, or automated document-processing workflows. If LibreDWG is not present, or only trusted DWG files are processed, practical exposure is lower.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or any cited evidence of active exploitation. It references a GitHub issue comment, but no exploit status, proof-of-concept details, or real-world attack reporting are provided here.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The useful facts are product/version, bug class, and source location. Do not assume code execution, denial of service, affected downstream products, or patch availability without validating against LibreDWG upstream history and local build provenance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems and applications using GNU LibreDWG 0.10.
  • Check LibreDWG upstream guidance for a fixed version or official workaround.
  • Avoid processing untrusted DWG files with affected versions until assessed.
  • Run DWG parsing workloads with least privilege and isolation.
  • Restrict file-upload paths that feed LibreDWG-based processing.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether GNU LibreDWG 0.10 is installed or bundled.
  • Identify services that parse DWG files automatically.
  • Check whether DWG inputs come from untrusted users or partners.
  • Review upstream LibreDWG issue and release notes for remediation status.
  • Verify mitigations in staging before restoring risky file-processing flows.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-21843 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.