LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-20636: SQL injection vulnerability found in Joyplus-cms v.1.6.0 allows a remote attacker to access sensitive infor...

SQL injection vulnerability found in Joyplus-cms v.1.6.0 allows a remote attacker to access sensitive information via the id parameter of the goodbad() function.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-20636 is a SQL injection issue reported in Joyplus-cms v1.6.0. A remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to access sensitive information through improper handling of the id parameter in goodbad(). The sources do not confirm active exploitation or a specific vendor patch.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for any internet-facing Joyplus-cms v1.6.0 instance because the reported impact is sensitive information disclosure without authentication. If the product is not in use, priority drops to inventory confirmation and recordkeeping.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-89 SQL injection in the goodbad() function's id parameter. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, high confidentiality impact, no integrity or availability impact. Official affected metadata is incomplete.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running Joyplus-cms v1.6.0 with the affected functionality reachable by untrusted users. The CVE record lists affected vendor and product fields as n/a, so asset owners should verify product identity from deployment evidence.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not include CISA KEV status, active exploitation evidence, or weaponized public exploit confirmation. The scoring indicates remote unauthenticated reachability and confidentiality risk, but only the cited GitHub issue is provided as a technical reference.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the description identifies Joyplus-cms v1.6.0 and the id parameter in goodbad(), while structured affected product data is n/a. Avoid broad product assumptions. Validate against local source, deployment routes, and the referenced GitHub issue before assigning exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Joyplus-cms v1.6.0 deployments and owners.
  • Check the upstream project issue for confirmed vendor guidance.
  • Apply a vendor-maintained update or workaround if available.
  • Restrict public access to affected CMS functionality where possible.
  • Review database access code for parameterized query handling.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory web assets for Joyplus-cms v1.6.0 usage.
  • Confirm whether the affected goodbad() functionality is deployed.
  • Review access logs for unusual requests to related endpoints.
  • Check whether compensating controls restrict untrusted access.
  • Document patch or workaround status for each deployment.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-20636 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-20636Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.