Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Immuta v2.8.2 allowed project names to include unsanitized HTML that the application rendered. A malicious project name could mislead users or send them to a phishing site to steal credentials. The supplied sources do not provide CVSS, patch details, or evidence of active exploitation.
Executive priority
Prioritize if Immuta v2.8.2 is used for sensitive data governance and project creation is broadly available. Business risk is credential theft through trusted application screens, but evidence is incomplete without vendor fix details or exploitation reports.
Technical view
CVE-2020-15951 is an HTML injection issue in Immuta v2.8.2 project-name handling. User-supplied project names were rendered without proper sanitization, enabling arbitrary HTML content in the application context. Reported impact is user redirection to phishing content, not confirmed code execution.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to organizations running Immuta v2.8.2 where untrusted or lower-privileged users can create or rename projects viewed by other users.
Exploitation context
The CVE record describes a phishing-oriented attack path. The source bundle does not cite CISA KEV listing, public exploitation, exploit code, or observed attacks.
Researcher notes
The public bundle identifies only Immuta v2.8.2 and an unsanitized project-name field. No CVSS vector, CWE, affected CPE, fixed version, or exploitation confirmation is provided. Validate scope directly against deployed Immuta versions and vendor advisory details.
Mitigation direction
- Confirm whether any Immuta deployment is version 2.8.2.
- Check Immuta and Bishop Fox guidance for fixed versions or vendor remediation.
- Restrict project creation or renaming to trusted users until remediated.
- Review existing project names for unexpected HTML, links, or redirect content.
- Warn users not to follow suspicious application-rendered links.
Validation and detection
- Inventory deployed Immuta versions and compare against v2.8.2 exposure.
- Review application roles allowed to create or rename projects.
- Inspect project names for embedded HTML or suspicious links.
- Confirm vendor remediation is applied in a non-production validation environment.
- Review authentication logs for phishing-related account anomalies.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CVE-2020-15951 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Unknown
- CVSS
- Not scored
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS and timeline data
No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.immuta.com/CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://labs.bishopfox.com/advisoriesCVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://labs.bishopfox.com/advisories/immuta-version-2.8.2CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.