LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-12781: Combodo iTop - CSRF

Combodo iTop contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, attackers can execute specific commands via malicious site request forgery.

MediumCVSS 5.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-12781 is a cross-site request forgery issue in Combodo iTop. If conditions are met, an attacker could cause a user’s browser to send unwanted requests that execute specific commands in iTop. The business risk is unauthorized change, not data theft or outage, based on the supplied CVSS impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority integrity risk. Prioritize remediation for internet-accessible or heavily used iTop instances, especially where business workflows depend on trusted configuration or command execution inside the platform.

Technical view

The supplied record maps the issue to CWE-352 with CVSS 3.1 score 5.7: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N. This indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, required privileges and user interaction, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Combodo iTop. The affected version data in the bundle is incomplete, listing only version "0", so teams should verify installed iTop versions against Combodo’s advisory and any vendor release notes.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The attack model requires user interaction and involves forged browser requests, so risk depends on authenticated iTop use and whether vulnerable state-changing actions lack CSRF protection.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sufficient to identify the vulnerability class, product, and CVSS characteristics, but incomplete for exact affected versions and fixes in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming active exploitation or a specific patch level without checking the linked vendor advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the Combodo iTop security advisory for affected and fixed versions.
  • Upgrade iTop if vendor guidance identifies a fixed release.
  • Restrict iTop access to trusted users and networks where feasible.
  • Monitor vendor guidance for any additional mitigation instructions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all Combodo iTop deployments and installed versions.
  • Compare installed versions with the Combodo advisory and CVE record.
  • Review logs for unexpected administrative or state-changing actions.
  • Confirm change-management records for any recent iTop upgrades or mitigations.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-12781 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.13.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-12781Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
CombodoiTop0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.