LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-12495: ENDRESS+HAUSER: Ecograph T utilizing Webserver firmware version 1.x has improper privilege management

Endress+Hauser Ecograph T (Neutral/Private Label) (RSG35, ORSG35) with Firmware version prior to V2.0.0 is prone to improper privilege management. The affected device has a web-based user interface with a role-based access system. Users with different roles have different write and read privileges. The access system is based on dynamic "tokens". The vulnerability is that user sessions are not closed correctly and a user with fewer rights is assigned the higher rights when he logs on.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Endress+Hauser Ecograph T devices can mishandle web-user sessions so a lower-privileged user may receive higher privileges. The business risk is unauthorized operational changes or disruption on affected recorders/data managers if their web interface is reachable.

Executive priority

Treat as high-priority for operational environments. The issue affects integrity and availability, not just data exposure, so remediation should be scheduled promptly with operations to avoid unsafe downtime.

Technical view

CVE-2020-12495 is CWE-269 improper privilege management in RSG35 and ORSG35 Ecograph T firmware before V2.0.0. The web UI uses dynamic tokens for role-based access, but sessions are not closed correctly, enabling privilege mix-up. CVSS 3.1 is 9.1 with high integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Endress+Hauser RSG35 Ecograph T and ORSG35 Neutral/Private Label devices running affected firmware, especially V1.0.0 or firmware before V2.0.0, with the web interface reachable from corporate, remote-access, or plant networks.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, but the sources do not provide exploit mechanics or observed attacks.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for affected products, firmware range, CVSS, and privilege-management behavior. Public sources in the bundle do not document exploit code, exploitation in the wild, or detailed vendor workarounds beyond the fixed-version boundary.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected devices to firmware V2.0.0 or later where vendor-supported.
  • Restrict web interface access to trusted management networks only.
  • Review vendor advisory VDE-2020-021 before operational changes.
  • Disable unnecessary remote access paths to affected devices.
  • Apply compensating monitoring where immediate firmware update is not feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory RSG35 and ORSG35 Ecograph T devices across operational networks.
  • Confirm each device firmware version against the pre-V2.0.0 affected range.
  • Verify whether the device web UI is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review user/session logs for unexpected privilege changes, if available.
  • After remediation, confirm firmware version and access restrictions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-269: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-12495 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H3.95.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-12495Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Endress+HauserRSG35 - Ecograph TV1.0.0Listed
Endress+HauserORSG35 - Ecograph T Neutral/Private LabelV1.0.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-269 · source CWE mapping

Improper Privilege Management

Improper Privilege Management represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.