LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-10969: FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and...

FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to javax.swing.JEditorPane.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a high-severity Jackson Databind deserialization issue. A vulnerable Java service could process crafted data in a way that exposes confidentiality, integrity, and availability if risky typing features and the relevant gadget class are reachable. Evidence provided does not show known active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or partner-facing Java systems that parse untrusted data. Treat this as high urgency where old Jackson Databind versions are present, but avoid assuming compromise without local evidence or a cited active-exploitation source.

Technical view

CVE-2020-10969 affects FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4. It is classified as CWE-502 and relates to interaction between serialization gadgets and polymorphic typing involving javax.swing.JEditorPane. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8, with network attack vector and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Most likely exposure is Java applications or vendor products bundling jackson-databind before 2.9.10.4, especially where untrusted input reaches polymorphic deserialization. Downstream advisories from Debian, NetApp, and Oracle indicate third-party product exposure existed, but the bundle does not enumerate exact affected deployments.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Exploitability depends on application configuration, reachable classpath gadgets, and whether untrusted content is deserialized with unsafe typing behavior. The CVSS vector marks user interaction as required.

Researcher notes

The CVE record lists generic affected data as n/a, so version scope comes from the description. Validate real risk by combining dependency version, configuration, reachable code paths, and classpath contents. Do not treat every Jackson deployment as exploitable without those conditions.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade jackson-databind to 2.9.10.4 or later, following vendor guidance.
  • Apply relevant Debian, Oracle, NetApp, or application vendor updates where bundled.
  • Disable unsafe polymorphic/default typing for untrusted input where feasible.
  • Restrict deserialization inputs to expected, validated types and trusted sources.
  • Review vendor advisories for product-specific fixes before production rollout.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications and products bundling jackson-databind 2.x.
  • Confirm deployed versions are not earlier than 2.9.10.4.
  • Search dependency lockfiles, SBOMs, container images, and vendor notices.
  • Identify code paths deserializing untrusted JSON with polymorphic typing enabled.
  • Confirm regression tests cover expected deserialization behavior after upgrades.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-502: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-10969 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-10969Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-502 · source CWE mapping

Deserialization of Untrusted Data

Deserialization of Untrusted Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.