LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-10937: An issue was discovered in IPFS (aka go-ipfs) 0.4.23.

An issue was discovered in IPFS (aka go-ipfs) 0.4.23. An attacker can generate ephemeral identities (Sybils) and leverage the IPFS connection management reputation system to poison other nodes' routing tables, eclipsing the nodes that are the target of the attack from the rest of the network. Later versions, in particular go-ipfs 0.7, mitigate this.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-10937 affects IPFS/go-ipfs 0.4.23. An attacker could create many short-lived identities and manipulate peer reputation so targeted nodes lose an accurate view of the wider IPFS network. This can isolate nodes and disrupt availability or routing reliability. Later go-ipfs versions, especially 0.7, are described as mitigating it.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted network-resilience risk, not an emergency mass-exploitation event based on the provided evidence. Upgrade legacy go-ipfs 0.4.23 nodes where IPFS availability, routing integrity, or content reachability matters.

Technical view

The issue is a Sybil-assisted eclipse attack against go-ipfs connection management and DHT routing behavior. Ephemeral identities can poison routing tables and cause selected nodes to prefer attacker-controlled peers, reducing connectivity to honest network participants. The bundle provides no CVSS, CWE, CPE, or active exploitation evidence.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to organizations running go-ipfs 0.4.23 nodes, particularly publicly reachable IPFS peers relying on DHT routing. The source bundle does not identify additional affected products, packaged distributions, or CPEs.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. It describes a practical research-backed attack pattern against vulnerable IPFS routing behavior, not a simple application exploit or local privilege issue.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, IPFS DHT hardening reference, and related academic publication. No CVSS vector, CWE mapping, patch commit, or exploit-in-the-wild claim is included in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any go-ipfs 0.4.23 nodes in production or research environments.
  • Upgrade vulnerable go-ipfs nodes; sources specifically cite go-ipfs 0.7 as mitigating this issue.
  • Review IPFS project guidance for any newer hardening recommendations.
  • Prioritize exposed peers that support business-critical content availability or routing functions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory IPFS nodes and record go-ipfs version numbers.
  • Confirm no production node remains on go-ipfs 0.4.23.
  • Check whether public peers are relying on vulnerable DHT routing behavior.
  • Document upgrade status and any compensating controls for remaining legacy nodes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-10937 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.