LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2020-10024: ARM Platform Uses Signed Integer Comparison When Validating Syscall Numbers

The arm platform-specific code uses a signed integer comparison when validating system call numbers. An attacker who has obtained code execution within a user thread is able to elevate privileges to that of the kernel. See NCC-ZEP-001 This issue affects: zephyrproject-rtos zephyr version 1.14.0 and later versions. version 2.1.0 and later versions.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2020-10024 is a Zephyr RTOS ARM privilege-escalation flaw. If an attacker already has code running inside a user thread, the bug can let that code gain kernel-level privileges. This is high impact for embedded products that rely on Zephyr user/kernel separation.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for Zephyr-based ARM products where kernel compromise affects safety, confidentiality, or device control. It is less urgent for assets that do not use Zephyr, do not target ARM, or do not run attacker-influenced user code.

Technical view

The ARM platform-specific Zephyr syscall validation logic used a signed integer comparison for syscall numbers. The CVE maps this to CWE-697 and scores 7.8 CVSS v3.1, with local attack vector, low privileges, high complexity, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in embedded or IoT firmware using Zephyr on ARM, especially versions identified as affected: 1.14.0 and later, and 2.1.0 and later. Network exposure is not indicated by the sources; exploitation requires prior user-thread code execution.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The attacker must already execute code in a user thread. The security consequence is escalation from constrained user execution to kernel privileges.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record, Zephyr advisory references, and linked upstream pull requests. The bundle identifies affected Zephyr version ranges but does not provide a complete product list, exploit availability, or exact fixed release mapping.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Zephyr security guidance for the fixed revision applicable to your branch.
  • Upgrade Zephyr or backport the upstream correction through vendor-supported channels.
  • Inventory firmware and SBOMs for Zephyr ARM builds in affected version ranges.
  • Prioritize products that run untrusted or externally influenced user-thread code.
  • Request device-vendor firmware updates where Zephyr is embedded indirectly.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm Zephyr versions and ARM targets in source, SBOMs, and shipped firmware.
  • Verify the relevant upstream pull-request fixes are present in your maintained branch.
  • Review product architecture for user-mode syscall use and isolation assumptions.
  • Run regression tests around syscall validation and privilege boundaries.
  • Confirm deployed firmware images no longer contain affected Zephyr code.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-697: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2020-10024 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.16Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2020-10024Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
zephyrproject-rtoszephyr1.14.0, 2.1.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-697 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Comparison

Incorrect Comparison represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.